• 01.school
  • 02.vision
  • 03.mission
  • 04.program
  • 05.accreditation
  • 06.admission
  • 07.policies
  • 08.faculty
  • 09.research
  • 10.awards
  • 11.scholarships
  • 12.affiliation
  • 13.development
  • 14.gallery
  • 15.news
  • 16.events
  • 17.forms
  • 18.contact
  • 19.employment
  • 01.school
    01.school

    archawai‘i || SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

    Architectural education at the University of Hawai‘i began in 1946 with a Pre-Architecture Program offered in the College of Applied Science. In 1965, Pre-Architecture was changed to a four-year program B.A. in Pre-Architecture. In 1967, the Department of Art became the Department of Art and Architecture, and the B.A. was replaced by a B.F.A. in Environmental Design. In 1969, a new Department of Architecture was formed within the Colleges of Arts and Sciences. A Master of Architecture Program was approved in 1971 with emphasis in Design Technology, Urban/Regional Design, and Tropical Development Studies; the program received initial accreditation by the National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB) in 1972.

    The Department of Architecture was reorganized in 1976 and a Bachelor of Architecture (B.Arch.) degree was developed. The program was accredited by the NAAB in 1978, and in 1980, the School conferred the first B.Arch. degree.

    The School of Architecture (archawai‘i) was established in 1980 led by Dean Elmer Botsai. Raymond Yeh, assumed the deanship in 1993. The School's present building was completed in 1994. In 1996, the School received full-term NAAB reaccreditation for its existing B. Arch. first professional degree and its M.Arch. first professional degree.

    In 1999, a seven-year, 212-credit first professional Architecture Doctorate (Arch.D.) degree program was approved by the University Board of Regents to replace the existing M.Arch. and B.Arch. degree programs. In 2004 the program was accredited by the NAAB. The School was the first in the nation to offer an accredited professional architecture doctoral degree. In 2008 at the request of the NAAB, the School changed the title of the degree from Arch. D. to Doctor of Architecture (D.Arch.). Clark Llewellyn assumed the deanship in the summer of 2007.

    The School has 16 full-time faculty and approximately 60 part-time adjunct, lecturer, and affiliate faculty. There is a diverse student body of approximately 280 students. The School is the only U.S. school of architecture in the middle of the Pacific region and the only school of architecture in the nation where a majority of the student body consists of Asian and Pacific Islander minority groups. The School of Architecture (archawai‘i) has had more than 1,400 graduates since its beginning. The School has developed a reputation for its strong connections to Hawai‘i and the Asia Pacific region, and its integration of theory and practice.

  • 02.vision + 03.mission

    VISION || archawai‘i inspires
    transformative design
    at the global scale
    with preeminence
    in the Asia-Pacific region.

    MISSION || archawai‘i responds to
    our unique location
    in the Asia-Pacific region
    and recognizes
    the privilege and responsibility
    to address cultural, environmental,
    and social diversity.
    We commit to
    passionate and engaging
    community participation
    through teaching, learning, research,
    professional practice, and service.

  • 04.program
    04.program

    program

    DOCTOR OF ARCHITECTURE DEGREE || archawai‘i offers the only NAAB accredited Doctorate of Architecture, a seven-year program consisting of 126 undergraduate credits and 90 graduate credits. The program provides students the unique opportunity to extensively research a particular area of interest, supported by interdisciplinary coursework and one or two semesters of professional studio.

    The Primary activities in the D.Arch program include: Framing architectural inquires within social, cultural, and interdisciplinary studies with emphasis on Asia and the Pacific; Investigating local/global relations evidenced in theory and practice with an emphasis on the quality of the built and natural environment; Critically testing and expanding the definitions of, and relationships between the academy and the profession; Using research as a basis for the grounding of design and as a primary means to expand knowledge in the discipline; and Participating with local and international partners in applied design research and community outreach projects.

    GLOBAL TRACK : Dual Degree || archawai‘i has partnered with Tongji University College of Architecture and Urban Planning (Shanghai, China), to implement a Global Track/China Focus as part of its graduate professional program in architecture, the Doctor of Architecture degree. Students who successfully complete this track will have the option to obtain a Master of Architecture degree from Tongji University as well as the Doctor of Architecture degree from the University of Hawai’i at Mānoa. This innovative, timely, and empowering dual-degree track, for its students and their Chinese classmates, builds upon the archawai‘i proud 35-year history, and derives directly from its Vision Statement and Strategic Plan to identify the School’s aspiration to pre-eminence in the Asia and Pacific Region, with a corresponding curricular focus. Please click here to review the application process if you are an interested candidate.


    BACHELOR OF ART IN INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES || archawai‘i has partnered with the Colleges of Arts and Sciences to offer a 4-year Bachelor of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies with a concentration in construction management, historic preservation, interior design, landscape design, urban design, or architecture design. Other areas of concentration may be proposed for approval by the school and the Interdisciplinary Studies Program.


    STUDY ABROAD || The Doctor of Architecture (D.Arch) program includes an international student exchange program with leading universities in the Asia Pacific region. This program allows D.Arch students to establish international contacts for new learning experiences and future networking opportunities, to gain exposure about different cultures and societies, and to encourage design research on specific topics within a unique setting.

    The program involves enrollment for a semester/term at an Asia Pacific university and, when possible, office experience in an architecture office within the particular country.

    Students may apply for scholarships to experience the architecture programs at the following universities with which the School or Architecture has exchange agreements.

    Chulalongkorn University Bangkok, Thailand
    National University of Singapore, Singapore
    Tongji University, Shanghai, China

    Students have participated in short term international exchange experiences with students in architecture schools in Australia, China, Hong Kong, Micronesia, Japan, Korea, Taiwan & Thailand.

    Seoul Studio in Spring 2011: ARCH 543 | ARCH 692 | ARCH 693


    PROFESSIONAL STUDIO || The Professional Studio (ARCH 547C, ARCH 547P, ARCH 547E) is a twelve-credit course that includes scholarly and research activity combined with professional experience occurring in an off-campus location. Students are able to focus as they are involved with the Professional Studio as their sole activity for the semester. Students are offered the following Professional Studio options:


    ARCH 547C PROFESSIONAL STUDIO: COMMUNITY DESIGN | The studio involves professional research and design on outreach community projects that may include architectural design, technological innovation, historic preservation, urban design, or other topics that consults & benefits a specific community user group.

    ARCH 547P PROFESSIONAL STUDIO: PRACTICUM | The studio combines scholarly and research activity integrated with the activities of a professional architecture, engineering, planning, construction, or development firm. Practice activities are guided by an adjunct faculty member and selected firm mentors. A focus is given to issues of leadership, critical and creative thinking, and the influence of culture on design decisions. Firms include major U.S. firms with approximately one third located internationally ( e.g., London, New York, San Francisco, Hawai‘i, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Shanghai ).

    ARCH 547E PROFESSIONAL STUDIO: ALTERNATIVE | The studio combines research and design under the professional guidance of a licensed professional in a location chosen by the student and developed as an Alternative Experience to relate the students chosen research for the DArch Project to a professional work environment.



    COURSE DESCRIPTIONS || Please visit the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Catalog.

  • 05.accreditation
    05.accreditation

    accreditation

    The Doctor of Architecture degree program is accredited by the National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB).

    In the United States, most state registration boards require a degree from an accredited professional degree program as a prerequisite for licensure. The National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB), which is the sole agency authorized to accredit U.S. professional degree programs in architecture, recognizes three types of degrees: the Bachelor of Architecture, the Master of Architecture, and the Doctor of Architecture. A program may be granted a 6-year, 3-year, or 2-year term of accreditation, depending on the extent of its conformance with established educational standards.

    Doctor of Architecture and Master of Architecture degree programs may consist of a pre-professional undergraduate degree and a professional graduate degree that, when earned sequentially, constitute an accredited professional education. However, the preprofessional degree is not, by itself, recognized as an accredited degree.

    University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, School of Architecture, offers the following NAAB-accredited degree program:

    D. Arch. (126 undergraduate credits + 90 graduate credits)
    Next accreditation visit: 2012

  • 06.admission
    06.admission

    admission

    archawai‘i offers a single degree, the Doctor of Architecture (D.Arch.). Applications for admission are received from students that have completed high school, transfer students who have completed some college level work, and from students who have completed Baccalaureate or advanced degrees in pre-architecture or other fields.

    All applicants for admission to archawai‘i must complete a University of Hawai‘i system application form by the stated deadline for the semester in which initial enrollment is sought. For information on the application process, see http://manoa.hawaii.edu/admissions/.

    Acceptance to the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa & archawai‘i is based on various criteria, including previous academic performance, coursework previously completed & the quality of prior experiences.

    Applicants planning architecture as a career are encouraged to take at the high school or post-secondary level: four years of English and mathematics, plus art, physics, freehand and mechanical drawing, computer aided design, public speaking, information and computer science, history, geography, and at least two years of a foreign language.


    APPLICATION PROCEDURES ||
    A. All applicants for admission must complete a University of Hawai‘i System Application using the following steps:


    1. Download the University application form at http://www.hawaii.edu/admrec/ or apply online HERE. All applicants apply on the undergraduate web page using the "DArch" pull down menu.
    2. Complete all required information on the form and complete the application process according to the directions from the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Office of Admissions and Records.


    B. Transfer students and Applicants holding a Baccalaureate degree or higher must also complete (in addition to Part A above) a School of Architecture Supplemental Information for Admission form and submit the required documents by the stated deadline using the following steps:


    1. Applicants whose applications have been received by the University Office of Admissions and Records will receive the School of Architecture Supplemental Information for Admission form by mail. The form is also available for download HERE.
    2. Complete all fields on the School of Architecture Supplemental Information for Admission form, attach the required documents noted on the form, sign the form & mail all materials to the School at the address shown on the form by October 15 for spring applications and May 15 for fall applications.



    APPLICATION INTERVIEWS || The University Office of Admissions and Records will grant interviews upon request. The School does not require, nor does it grant, personal interviews as part of the admissions process.


    APPLICATION DEADLINE || Fall priority deadline is January 1 and final deadline is May 1. Spring priority deadline is September 1 and final deadline is October 1. International students must apply by the priority deadlines to allow time for visa processing.

    All required application materials listed above must be received UHM by the above listed deadlines. Incomplete and/or late applications will not receive consideration. Applicants should advise the School and the University Office of Admissions and Records immediately of any changes of address. The School assumes no responsibility for missed deadlines resulting from a failure to notify UHM and the School of a change of address.

    The archawai‘i Admissions Committee begins reviewing completed applications in the order in which they are received from the UHM Admissions office. Early application is therefore advisable. Most applicants will receive final notification beginning six weeks after the deadlines listed above.


    DEFERRED ADMISSION || The School and the University do not grant deferred admission. Applicants wishing to defer admission must reapply to the University and the School.


    OWNERSHIP OF APPLICATION MATERIALS || Supplemental documents submitted by applicants become the property of the School and will be retained for students accepted into the program after the admissions decisions to the School of Architecture have been made.


    ADVISING || Informal academic advising may be requested by prospective students by contacting the archawai‘i Student Services Office. Students who have been accepted to the School should contact the Student Services Office for information regarding orientation, registration & mandatory advising.

  • 07.policies
    07.policies

    policies

    1. INTRODUCTION
    Policies of the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa (hereinafter "UHM") & School of Architecture (hereinafter "SoA") Policies apply to all students of the SoA. Where SoA Policies differ from those of UHM, the more restrictive policies shall prevail. All SoA students are expected to read and abide by all SoA and UHM policies. The SoA Policies are subject to change; students will be notified of such changes by a revision on the School website.

    2. USE OF FACILITIES
    2.1 PROFESSIONAL FEE || Architecture students will be assessed a Professional Fee of $500.00 per student per semester (each summer, fall, and spring semester) for the academic year.
    2.2 FOOD AND DRINK || Consumption of food and drinks is not allowed in any SoA classroom, the Digital Fabrication Services facility, Reading Room, and Shop except in studio classrooms in a designated area.
    2.3 SMOKING || The SoA follows the current UHM Policy and Procedures.
    2.4 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES || The SoA follows the current UHM Policy and Procedures.
    2.5 NOISE || Noise must be kept to a minimum within the SoA. Boisterous activity, construction work, phone use in classrooms, music or other noisy activities are strictly prohibited at all times. Electronic devices should be used with personal earphones. Construction using any hand tool or any power tool is to be confined to the Shop or the loading dock area only.
    2.6 ANIMALS || Animals, pets, etc. are not permitted in any location within the SoA (except for guide dogs).
    2.7 ENERGY CONSERVATION || Lights should be on only in occupied classrooms and studio bays. Windows must be closed when the air conditioning is on. Air conditioning is scheduled to be turned on during peak hours only.
    2.8 BUILDING MODIFICATION || SoA building assemblies may not be altered or modified in any way without permission from the SoA Administration.
    2.9 STUDIOS ||

    2.9.1 ACCESS AND PRIVILEGE | SoA classrooms designated for Studio use are accessible 24-hours/7-days a week. Students are expected to conduct themselves responsibly. The SoA reserves the right to change the policy regarding studio accessibility at any time.
    2.9.2 FURNITURE | Depending on the availability of furniture and student enrollment, the SoA will provide each student enrolled in an upper level studio with a minimum of one chair and one desk. SoA furniture may be rearranged only with approval of the studio Instructor, and may not be removed from the studio. Students may supplement what is provided by the SoA with their own furniture provided there is space available and Instructor and SoA Administration consent has been obtained. Personal furnishings are subject to the SoA cleanup policy at the end of each semester.
    2.9.3 HANGING DRAWINGS | Drawings may be attached only on the demising partitions and the bulletin board surfaces of the studio, with push pins or staples.
    2.9.4 MALFUNCTIONS | Any malfunction of lights, air conditioning, exit doors, hardware, plumbing, etc. should be reported immediately to the SoA Administration.
    2.9.5 CLEAN UP | a. Each student is responsible to vacate all studio and other SoA spaces and remove all personal belongings no later than the first Sunday following the end of final exam week each semester. Classrooms may only be used by students during the instructional period each semester; each studio classroom may only be used by students currently enrolled in the studio section designated for the classroom. Continuing Doctorate Project students will be permitted to use studio space between instructional periods. | b. SoA staff will inspect the studios after the Sunday following final exam week. The SoA reserves the right to withhold student grades & assess a fee for clean up or removal. | c. Any personal belongings left in classrooms or SoA common areas later than the first Sunday following final exam week will be disposed of without notice.

    2.10 DIGITAL FABRICATION SERVICES (DFS) (RM. 207)   ||

    2.10.1 AVAILABILITY | A limited number of computers are available for use by SoA students under the supervision of the DFS staff for short duration use for scanning and sending files for printing.
    2.10.2 HOURS OF OPERATION | Hours are posted hours on the DFS door. The DFS is closed during scheduled UHM holidays and weekends.
    2.10.3 COSTS | Students are charged nominal fees for use of DFS equipment that may include the following: printer, plotter, large format scanner, laser cutter, and 3D printer. Price lists are available in the DFS.
    2.10.4 PRINTING, SCANNING, AND DIGITAL FABRICATION EQUIPMENT | Consult with DFS staff for printer and plotter access and procedures.
    2.10.5 MALFUNCTIONS | Students should report any equipment malfunctions to the DFS staff immediately.

    2.11 FABRICATION WORKSHOP (RM. 104)   ||

    2.11.1 OBJECTIVES | a. To provide hands-on experience in the use of materials and construction methods in order to develop an understanding of their impact on design and ability to make objects. | b. To provide appropriate knowledge of equipment and facilities in an orderly and safe environment for the above purposes.
    2.11.2 AVAILABILITY AND USAGE | The Fabrication Workshop and equipment are available for use by students that have had an orientation, have signed a Fabrication Workshop Risk and Release Agreement, and only when working under the supervision of the authorized staff or certified faculty. The Fabrication Workshop is to be used for coursework only.
    2.11.3 HOURS OF OPERATION | Hours are subject to adjustments for class time and special projects. Consult the posted hours on the Fabrication Workshop door.
    2.11.4 POLICIES | a. All users of the Fabrication Workshop are required to attend a shop orientation session prior to using Fabrication Workshop. | b. The personal safety of each and every individual at the SoA is of primary importance. Safety rules regarding each piece of equipment must be strictly observed and adhered to at all times. | c. At the end of each operation on a machine the user must clean-up each operation/work area. | d. All unused materials must be removed from the Shop. | Additional policies are available from the Fabrication Workshop. All users are required to read and comply to these written policies.

    2.12 JOHN AND MARIA LYNN READING ROOM (Rm. 301P)   ||

    2.12.1 AVAILABILITY AND USAGE | Students wishing access to the Reading Room should make a request to the Student Services office.
    2.12.1 REGULATIONS | a. Publications may be checked out for one week, through Student Services. | b. The room is to be left in the same order as when entered.

    3. SAFETY
    3.1 FIRST AID || First-Aid Kits are placed in each studio and the SoA Office, and are to be used only in the case of an emergency.
    3.2 ELECTRICAL USE || Use of extension cords that cross pedestrian ways and multiple appliance connections are prohibited.
    3.3 TOXIC SUBSTANCES || Spray paint, spray adhesive, and any other toxic substance may only be used in the service driveway area outside the Shop on the ground floor. No use is allowed in the hallways or studios. The SoA follows the current UHM Policy and Procedures regarding the disposal of toxic substances.
    3.4 WHEELED VEHICLES || Wheeled vehicles, such as motorcycles, mopeds, skateboards, and bicycles are not allowed in any area within the SoA. Exceptions include: (a) wheelchairs, (b) bicycles to be stored in the bicycle rack on the second floor, (c) compact wheeled vehicles (e.g., skateboards or push scooters) carried and stored away from circulation areas. Vehicles not in compliance with this policy will be ticketed and removed by Security.
    3.5 POWER TOOLS || No hand power tools may be operated in the studios, classrooms or corridors. All power tools must be used in or outside Room 104.

    4. SECURITY
    4.1 CLASSROOM SECURITY || Security of the Student Lounge (Rm. 307), and all studios are under the responsibility of the students. At least two people must be in studio during offpeak hours. The last person to leave the studio is responsible to turn off all lights and lock all doors. Sleeping is only permitted if there is at least one other person awake and working in the studio at the time. Studios and classrooms are to remain unlocked during normal business hours, and are to be locked during other hours.
    4.2 PERSONAL BELONGINGS || Students are responsible for all personal belongings brought into the SoA. The SoA can assume no responsibility or liability for the theft, loss, or damage to any personal belongings.
    4.3 EMERGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION || In the event of an emergency, call UHM security at 956-6911 (66911 on campus phone lines), and if warranted, 911, and contact a member of the SoA Administration or faculty.

    5. ACADEMIC POLICIES
    5.1 COURSE REQUIREMENTS || Architecture Instructor is required to distribute a syllabus during the first week of class. Courses must list required NAAB Student Performance Criteria (grad) and Student Learning Outcomes (undergrad).
    5.2 COURSE GRADING CRITERIA || The SoA follows the current UHM Policy and Procedures regarding grading, including when "incomplete" grades may be given and when and why grades may be changed. All work to be graded must be turned in by 4:00 pm of the last day of exam week. No late work can be graded. An “I” Incomplete form must be received by the last day for grading or no “I” grade is allowed.
    5.3 CAMPUS POLICIES || The school supports and follows the "Campus Policies" of the UHM Catalog 2011-2012. An Instructor should define "regular attendance" for the individual class in the syllabus.
    5.4 CREDIT HOURS AND GRADES || a. Courses numbered 100-400 follow "undergraduate" credits and grades policy in the 2011-2012 UHM catalog. || b. Courses numbered 500 and 600 follow "graduate" credits and grades policy in the 2011-2012 UHM catalog.
    5.5 DESIGN STUDIO REVIEWS ||

    5.5.1 PUBLIC REVIEWS | All student design work is subject to review and evaluation in a final public review in the week before Final Exams. Students have an opportunity to present their work and receive formal criticism by invited SoA faculty and guests. All students and all interested individuals are welcome and encouraged to attend.
    5.5.2 STUDENT PRESENTATION SUBMISSION DEADLINES | All studio projects prepared for presentation at interim reviews must be completed and submitted to the Instructor 24 hours before the date of the review. All final studio projects prepared for presentation at final reviews must be completed and submitted to the Instructor in accordance with the SoA Final Review Schedule. No time extensions by Instructors are permitted.
    5.5.3 FINAL REVIEW SCHEDULE POSTING | A schedule of final reviews will be posted by the SoA each semester.
    5.5.4 FINAL REVIEW SCHEDULING | Final reviews are considered as final examinations and must be conducted as scheduled in the SoA Final Review Week according to the printed schedule. No additional studio work after SoA Final Review Week is allowable. Grading of student work at final reviews is conducted by the Instructor.
    5.5.5 FINAL REVIEW WEEK ATTENDANCE | Final reviews are part of the instructional period. Students are expected to attend the final review for their studio as well as the final reviews for other studios as determined by their studio instructor.

    5.6 RESTRICTED COURSES || The SoA reserves the right to restrict SoA courses to SoA students holding minimum qualifications. The SoA administration will make the final determination regarding the student's eligibility to enroll in a restricted course.
    5.7 COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO REVIEW ||

    Click HERE for pdf of Portfolio Guidelines
    5.7.1 POLICY STATEMENT | Each student must submit a Comprehensive Portfolio to the faculty for evaluation and approval before continuing to ARCH 415. Eligibility requirements for the Comprehensive Portfolio submittal include good academic standing (i.e., not on probation) and successful completion of the first three years of the program. The student may advance to graduate coursework only after the portfolio has been approved. If the portfolio is determined to be conditional, the faculty may require additional coursework and other conditions.
    5.7.2 INTENT OF PORTFOLIO REVIEW | a. The intent of portfolio review is to provide a process for faculty to assess each student's competency in architectural and urban design, as well as aptitude for advanced 400 and 500 level design and responsible participation in the Practicum Studio. | b. The intent of portfolio review is to provide a structured opportunity for each student to evaluate individual development within architectural education and produce a convincing representation of design work for future use in job procurement and as a necessary skill in professional practice. | c. The intent of portfolio review is to provide a forum for faculty and administration to collectively evaluate student progress and effectiveness of design curriculum and teaching methods. | Additional information is published each year in the Design Portfolio Guidelines available in the Student Services Office.
    5.7.3 DEFINITIONS | The term 'good standing' means that a minimum cumulative GPA of 2.50 in Architecture courses, and cumulative GPA of 2.00 in all UHM courses (including Architecture courses) has been met. Students who are on academic probation are not eligible to submit a portfolio for review.
    5.7.4 NOTIFICATION OF SUBMISSION ELIGIBILITY | Each SoA student is required to submit the portfolio before proceeding to ARCH 415. The portfolio submittal dates are printed in the SoA Academic Calendar each year. Late or incomplete portfolios will not be reviewed & will be considered a failure.
    5.7.5 NOTIFICATION OF REVIEW RESULTS | Students will be notified by the Comprehensive Portfolio Review Committee of the review results. Appeals on the results of the review for first and second reading are made to the Portfolio Review committee; for the third reading appeals are made directly to the Dean.
    5.7.6 QUALIFICATION FOR ENTRY INTO UPPER-LEVEL STUDIOS | Only students passing Comprehensive Portfolio Review will be allowed to enroll in ARCH 415. Students receiving a "Conditional Pass" will be permitted to enroll in ARCH 415 and may be subject to other stated conditions. Advancement to any 500 level coursework is only permitted after passing Comprehensive Portfolio Review.
    5.7.7 LIMIT ON PORTFOLIO SUBMISSIONS | A maximum of three submittals is permitted for the Comprehensive Portfolio Review. If a student does not pass portfolio in three attempts, the student must transfer out of the program.
    5.7.8 EXEMPTION FROM COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO REVIEW | Students entering the D.Arch. program during the summer 2008 semester or thereafter that hold a prior bachelor or higher degree are not required to submit for Comprehensive Portfolio Review. Students with a Bachelor's degree wishing to apply to the D.Arch. program are required to submit a portfolio along with other required application materials.

    5.8 ALL-SOA DESIGN EXERCISES || The SoA may periodically schedule all-SoA design exercises (e.g., a "charrette" or "esquisse") that require mandatory participation by all SoA students enrolled in design studio courses. Notification of such events will be made in advance to allow students and faculty to plan accordingly. As stated in the studio course syllabus, Instructors are at liberty to determine the means of evaluation and grading weight and criteria for their studio students for such exercises.
    5.9 NOTICES ||

    5.9.1 POSTED ACADEMIC INFORMATION NOTICES | SoA notices and other important academic information will be posted on locations that may include the bulletin boards and classroom doors. Failure to observe posted notices is not a satisfactory explanation for non-compliance with the requirements of any notice.
    5.9.2 E-MAIL NOTICES | The only e-mail address recognized by the SoA is the hawaii.edu address; SoA notices will be sent only to these addresses. Failure to read e-mail notices is not a satisfactory explanation for non-compliance with the requirements of any notice. Students are strongly advised to check their e-mail account on a regular basis.
    5.9.3 POSTED MISCELLANEOUS NOTICES | Miscellaneous notices should be posted either on the bulletin board outside room 210 (studio behind courtyard steps). Permission from the SoA Office is required prior to placing such notices.
    5.9.4 ALL SCHOOL MEETINGS | SoA All School Meetings will be conducted when necessary to discuss matters of importance, and may include important registration and advising information. All students are required to attend All School Meetings and will be held responsible for information given and to comply with any notices conveyed.
    5.9.5 PERSONAL MAIL AND PHONE MESSAGES | Personal notes and phone messages will not be taken for students by the SoA Office unless it is an emergency. The SoA is not responsible for student personal mail or other items delivered to the SoA.

    5.10 OWNERSHIP OF STUDENT WORK ||

    5.10.1 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS | The SoA follows the current UHM Policy and Procedures.
    5.10.2 SOA RIGHT TO BORROW | The SoA retains the right to borrow student work indefinitely for use in accreditation proceedings, SoA archives, or other purposes. If students wish to retain a record of their work for their own use, they are advised to record, photograph or copy any work prior to submission for grading.

    5.11 INSTRUCTOR/COURSE EVALUATIONS || Each student is required to complete an eCAFE instructional evaluation survey for each course at the end of the semester. To insure confidentiality, the survey is to be completed without the instructor being present.
    5.12 COMPUTER OWNERSHIP || Special Requirements: All students are expected to have their own laptop computer for studio and class work available in the classroom. Recommended laptop computer specifications may be obtained from the SoA IT specialist, Tony Cao.
    5.13 SOFTWARE || Instructors may require specific software for the satisfactory completion of coursework. Such software purchases are considered an educational cost similar to textbook purchases. The SoA does not authorize or condone the use of illegal software. The SoA will seek to provide licensed software "bundles" at reduced rates, and will notify students if and when they are available.
    5.14 ACADEMIC PROBATION || Academic probation follows UHM policy in catalog, both general and architecture sections.

    6. STANDARDS OF CONDUCT
    6.1 STUDIO CULTURE POLICY || The Students, Faculty, & Administration support the recommendations of the American Institute of Architecture Students (AIAS) Studio Culture Task Force Report: The Redesign of Studio Culture which encourages fostering the values of optimism, respect, sharing, engagement, and innovation. The SoA Studio Culture Policy is as follows:

    6.1.1 INTELLECTUAL | a. An important locus in a professional architecture curriculum and a unique model for learning where knowledge from other curricular areas, outside interests, and experiences are integrated and synthesized into creative and meaningful wholes. | b. A unique setting for learning that encourages reflection, analysis, critical thinking, dialogue, collaboration, risk-taking, innovation, and the free and open exchange of ideas such to develop the discipline of architecture and connect architecture more fully to life. | c. A curricular area that allows exploration of the process of learning and designing as well as the products of design. | d. A setting where pedagogical methods include and connect research, service, design and critique, all of which seek to promote the highest standards of learning and promote positive, constructive, useful, and productive interaction among individuals.
    6.1.2 ATTITUDINAL | a. A place that supports and fosters qualities of optimism, tolerance, sharing, and the highest standards of ethical behavior. | b. An environment where healthful work habits are encouraged, and where time management skills can develop in the pursuit of the highest standard of work. | c. A social setting where the acceptance and respect of all individuals regardless of race, gender, creed, age, religion, sexual orientation, socioeconomic background, or physical ability may unfold and be celebrated. | d. A place where a culture of engagement is developed, where individuals can become better citizens, architects, and partners in promoting positive relations among people, and between people and the built and natural environment. | e. A setting which explores and tests collaborative as well as individual learning and that encourages involvement with other academic and professional disciplines such to enrich and connect architecture to the broader society and culture. | f. A course that has an appropriate work load and that balances the work load with other courses and activities, and that encourages excellence in thought and action throughout a life-long educational experience.
    6.1.3 PHYSICAL | A working environment that is safe, secure, functional, healthful, and inspiring.

    The SoA commits to periodically revise the Studio Culture Policy as may be appropriate to respond to changed conditions.
    6.2 DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES || The SoA follows the current UHM Policy and Procedures.
    6.3 SEXUAL HARASSMENT || The SoA follows the current UHM Policy and Procedures.
    6.4 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION || The SoA follows the current UHM Policy and Procedures.

    7. NATIONAL ARCHITECTURAL ACCREDITING BOARD
    7.1 ACCREDITATION NOTICE || The Doctor of Architecture degree program is accredited by the National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB).
    In the United States, most state registration boards require a degree from an accredited professional degree program as a prerequisite for licensure. The National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB), which is the sole agency authorized to accredit U.S. professional degree programs in architecture, recognizes three types of degrees: the Bachelor of Architecture, the Master of Architecture, and the Doctor of Architecture. A program may be granted a 6-year, 3-year, or 2-year term of accreditation, depending on the extent of its conformance with established educational standards.
    Doctor of Architecture and Master of Architecture degree programs may consist of a pre-professional undergraduate degree and a professional graduate degree that, when earned sequentially, constitute an accredited professional education. However, the preprofessional degree is not, by itself, recognized as an accredited degree.
    University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, School of Architecture, offers the following NAABaccredited degree program:
    * D. Arch. (126 undergraduate credits + 90 graduate credits)
    * Next accreditation visit: 2012
    A copy of the latest NAAB Conditions for Accreditation for Professional Degree Programs in Architecture, and a copy of the NAAB Procedures for Accreditation of Professional Degree Programs in Architecture are available online at www.naab.org. A copy of the SoA Visiting Team Report and SoA Annual Reports for NAAB are available in the SoA Student Services Office and can be viewed at any times during normal business hours.
    7.2 ACCREDITATION NOTICE || The accredited degree program must demonstrate that each graduate possesses the knowledge and skills defined by the criteria set out below. The knowledge and skills are the minimum for meeting the demands of an internship leading to registration for practice.
    The school must provide evidence that its graduates have satisfied each criterion through required coursework. If credits are granted for courses taken at other institutions or online, evidence must be provided that the courses are comparable to those offered in the accredited degree program.
    The criteria encompass two levels of accomplishment:
    * Understanding | The capacity to classify, compare, summarize, explain and/or interpret information.
    * Ability | Proficiency in using specific information to accomplish a task, correctly selecting the appropriate information, and accurately applying it to the solution of a specific problem, while also distinguishing the effects of its implementation.
    The NAAB establishes performance criteria to help accredited degree programs prepare students for the profession while encouraging educational practices suited to the individual degree program. In addition to assessing whether student performance meets the professional criteria, the visiting team will assess performance in relation to the school's stated curricular goals and content. While the NAAB stipulates the student performance criteria that must be met, it specifies neither the educational format nor the form of student work that may serve as evidence of having met these criteria. Programs are encouraged to develop unique learning and teaching strategies, methods, and materials to satisfy these criteria. The NAAB encourages innovative methods for satisfying the criteria, provided the school has a formal evaluation process for assessing student achievement of these criteria and documenting the results.
    For the purpose of accreditation, graduating students must demonstrate understanding or ability as defined below in the Student Performance Criteria (SPC):
    Student Performance Criteria: The SPC are organized into realms to more easily understand the relationships between individual criteria.
    Realm A: Critical Thinking and Representation:
    Architects must have the ability to build abstract relationships and understand the impact of ideas based on research and analysis of multiple theoretical, social, political, economic, cultural and environmental contexts. This ability includes facility with the wider range of media used to think about architecture including writing, investigative skills, speaking, drawing and model making. Students' learning aspirations include:

    * Being broadly educated.
    * Valuing lifelong inquisitiveness.
    * Communicating graphically in a range of media.
    * Recognizing the assessment of evidence.
    * Comprehending people, place, and context.
    * Recognizing the disparate needs of client, community, and society.
    A.1. Communication Skills: Ability to read, write, speak and listen effectively.
    A.2. Design Thinking Skills: Ability to raise clear and precise questions, use abstract ideas to interpret information, consider diverse points of view, reach well-reasoned conclusions, and test alternative outcomes against relevant criteria and standards.
    A.3. Visual Communication Skills: Ability to use appropriate representational media, such as traditional graphic and digital technology skills, to convey essential formal elements at each stage of the programming and design process.
    A.4. Technical Documentation: Ability to make technically clear drawings, write outline specifications, and prepare models illustrating and identifying the assembly of materials, systems, and components appropriate for a building design.
    A.5. Investigative Skills: Ability to gather, assess, record, apply, and comparatively evaluate relevant information within architectural coursework and design processes.
    A.6. Fundamental Design Skills: Ability to effectively use basic architectural and environmental principles in design.
    A.7. Use of Precedents: Ability to examine and comprehend the fundamental principles present in relevant precedents and to make choices regarding the incorporation of such principles into architecture and urban design projects.
    A.8. Ordering Systems Skills: Understanding of the fundamentals of both natural and formal ordering systems and the capacity of each to inform two- and three-dimensional design.
    A.9. Historical Traditions and Global Culture: Understanding of parallel and divergent canons and traditions of architecture, landscape and urban design including examples of indigenous, vernacular, local, regional, national settings from the Eastern, Western, Northern, and Southern hemispheres in terms of their climatic, ecological, technological, socioeconomic, public health, and cultural factors.
    A.10. Cultural Diversity: Understanding of the diverse needs, values, behavioral norms, physical abilities, and social and spatial patterns that characterize different cultures and individuals and the implication of this diversity on the societal roles and responsibilities of architects.
    A.11. Applied Research: Understanding the role of applied research in determining function, form, and systems and their impact on human conditions and behavior.

    Realm B: Integrated Building Practices, Technical Skills and Knowledge:
    Architects are called upon to comprehend the technical aspects of design, systems and materials, and be able to apply that comprehension to their services. Additionally they must appreciate their role in the implementation of design decisions, and the impact of such decisions on the environment. Students learning aspirations include:

    * Creating building designs with well-integrated systems.
    * Comprehending constructability.
    * Incorporating life safety systems.
    * Integrating accessibility.
    * Applying principles of sustainable design.
    B.1. Pre-Design: Ability to prepare a comprehensive program for an architectural project, such as preparing an assessment of client and user needs, an inventory of space and equipment requirements, an analysis of site conditions (including existing buildings), a review of the relevant laws and standards and assessment of their implications for the project, and a definition of site selection and design assessment criteria.
    B.2. Accessibility: Ability to design sites, facilities, and systems to provide independent and integrated use by individuals with physical (including mobility), sensory, and cognitive disabilities.
    B.3. Sustainability: Ability to design projects that optimize, conserve, or reuse natural and built resources, provide healthful environments for occupants/users, and reduce the environmental impacts of building construction and operations on future generations through means such as carbon-neutral design, bioclimatic design, and energy efficiency.
    B.4. Site Design: Ability to respond to site characteristics such as soil, topography, vegetation, and watershed in the development of a project design.
    B.5. Life Safety: Ability to apply the basic principles of life-safety systems with an emphasis on egress.
    B.6. Comprehensive Design: Ability to produce a comprehensive architectural project that demonstrates each student's capacity to make design decisions across scales while integrating the following SPC:
    A.2. Design Thinking Skills
    A.4. Technical Documentation
    A.5. Investigative Skills
    A.8. Ordering Systems
    A.9. Historical Traditions and Global Culture
    B.2. Accessibility
    B.3. Sustainability
    B.4. Site Design
    B.5. Life Safety
    B.8. Environmental Systems
    B.9. Structural Systems
    B.7 Financial Considerations: Understanding of the fundamentals of building costs, such as acquisition costs, project financing and funding, financial feasibility, operational costs, and construction estimating with an emphasis on life-cycle cost accounting.
    B.8 Environmental Systems: Understanding the principles of environmental systems' design such as embodied energy, active and passive heating and cooling, indoor air quality, solar orientation, daylighting and artificial illumination, and acoustics; including the use of appropriate performance assessment tools.
    B.9. Structural Systems: Understanding of the basic principles of structural behavior in withstanding gravity and lateral forces and the evolution, range, and appropriate application of contemporary structural systems.
    B.10. Building Envelope Systems: Understanding of the basic principles involved in the appropriate application of building envelope systems and associated assemblies relative to fundamental performance, aesthetics, moisture transfer, durability, and energy and material resources.
    B.11. Building Service Systems: Understanding of the basic principles and appropriate application and performance of building service systems such as plumbing, electrical, vertical transportation, security, and fire protection systems.
    B.12. Building Materials and Assemblies: Understanding of the basic principles utilized in the appropriate selection of construction materials, products, components, and assemblies, based on their inherent characteristics and performance, including their environmental impact and reuse.

    Realm C: Leadership and Practice:
    Architects need to manage, advocate, and act legally, ethically and critically for the good of the client, society and the public. This includes collaboration, business, and leadership skills. Student learning aspirations include:

    * Knowing societal and professional responsibilities.
    * Comprehending the business of building.
    * Collaborating and negotiating with clients and consultants in the design process.
    * Discerning the diverse roles of architects and those in related disciplines.
    * Integrating community service into the practice of architecture.
    C.1. Collaboration: Ability to work in collaboration with others and in multidisciplinary teams to successfully complete design projects.
    C.2. Human Behavior: Understanding of the relationship between human behavior, the natural environment and the design of the built environment.
    C.3 Client Role in Architecture: Understanding of the responsibility of the architect to elicit, understand, and reconcile the needs of the client, owner, user groups, and the public and community domains.
    C.4. Project Management: Understanding of the methods for competing for commissions, selecting consultants and assembling teams, and recommending project delivery methods.
    C.5. Practice Management: Understanding of the basic principles of architectural practice management such as financial management and business planning, time management, risk management, mediation and arbitration, and recognizing trends that affect practice.
    C.6. Leadership: Understanding of the techniques and skills architects use to work collaboratively in the building design and construction process and on environmental, social, and aesthetic issues in their communities.
    C.7. Legal Responsibilities: Understanding of the architect's responsibility to the public and the client as determined by registration law, building codes and regulations, professional service contracts, zoning and subdivision ordinances, environmental regulation, and historic preservation and accessibility laws.
    C.8. Ethics and Professional Judgment: Understanding of the ethical issues involved in the formation of professional judgment regarding social, political and cultural issues in architectural design and practice.
    C.9. Community and Social Responsibility: Understanding of the architect's responsibility to work in the public interest, to respect historic resources, and to improve the quality of life for local and global neighbors.


    Click HERE to download University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa School of Architecture Policies: 2011 - 2012.

  • 08.faculty
    08.faculty

    faculty

    The School offers a diverse and outstanding faculty with substantial professional practice experience. This faculty includes adjunct and affiliate faculty who are distinguished faculty members in related disciplines at the University, and internationally known professionals and specialists around the world. Electronic communication technologies link the School to the off-campus faculty when students need immediate and constant contacts with their professionals and specialists.

    FULL-TIME FACULTY
    Dean: Clark E. Llewellyn, MArch, FAIA, NCARB
    Director of the Graduate Program: Spencer Leineweber, MA, FAIA
    Director of the Undergraduate Program: Magi S. Sarvimaeki, D.Design

    Amy C. Anderson, M.Arch (design, history/theory, urban studies)
    Randy D. Akiona, MS (construction management)
    Kazi Ashraf, PhD (design, history and theory)
    Spencer Leineweber, MA, FAIA (design, history of architecture, historic preservation)
    Stephen Meder, D.Arch (design, environmental research)
    Pu Miao, PhD (architectural/urban design, Chinese architecture)
    Joyce M. Noe, M.DesS, FAIA (design, professional practice)
    Kristopher M. Palagi, M.Arch (first-year design)
    Hyoung J. Park, M.Arch, SMArch, PhD (morphological transformation and digital design)
    David Rockwood, M.Arch (design, materials, fabrication)
    MARJA (MAGI) S. SARVIMAEKI // D.Sc, SAFA (design, history of architecture)
    W.H. Raymond Yeh, M.Arch, FAIA (architecture/urban design, professional practice)
    Homer Williams, D.Arch, NCARB

    VISITING FACULTY
    Luis Longhi, M.Arch(design)
    Byoung Soo Cho, M.Arch(design)
    Chris Bergum, MArch, PhD (history, systems, global practice)
    Lance Walters, M.Arch (Technology/Fabrication and Contempory Architectural Theory)

    LECTURERS
    Glenn Miyasato, PhD
    Loralee Arnold, M.Arch
    Jason Selley, B.Arch
    Martin J. Harms, PhD, FAIA (Design, Design Theory, History of Architectural Technology)
    Janine Clifford, D.Design (design, professional practice)
    Kevin Miyamura, B.Arch, M.S.Arch (Design, Theory, & Systems)

    STAFF
    Byron Apo, M.S., Administrative Officer
    Tony Cao, B.S., Director of Digital Media and Information Technology
    Lori Harting, B.A., Assistant to the Dean
    June Lee, B.S., Director of Student Services
    Diane Ogata, School Secretary
    Steven Hill, MFA Industrial Design, IDSA, FSA Fabrication Workshop Supervisor

    PRACTICUM FACULTY
    Ronald A. Altoon, FAIA, Altoon + Porter Architects LLP, Los Angeles, California
    Barry A. Berkus—Berkus Design Studio, Santa Barbara, California
    Jim Collins, MArch, FAIA, Payette Associates, Boston, Massachusetts
    Charles Davis, AB Arch, FAIA, EHDD, San Francisco, California
    Scott Dunlap, BArch, Gensler, San Francsico, California
    Fiske Crowell, FAIA, Sasaki & Associates, Boston, Massachusetts
    Joseph Ferraro, BFA, Ferraro Choi and Associates, Honolulu, Hawaii
    Ronald P. Gronowsky, BSArch, Zimmer Gunsul Frasca Partnership, Portland, Oregon
    Helen D. Hatch, MArch, TVS International, Atlanta, Georgia
    Douglas Hocking, AIA, LEED AP, Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates, New York, New York
    Mark B. Hults, MArch, HKS, Atlanta, Georgia
    Aaron J. Hyland, BSArch, Architectural Resources Group, San Francisco, California
    J.Scott Kilbourn, MArch, RTKL, United States
    Ronald Lu, PhD, Ronald Lu & Partners, Wanchai, Hong Kong
    Callum MacBean, Gensler, Shanghai, China
    Lorrin Matsunaga, MArch, Urban Works, Honolulu, Hawaii
    Lewis T. May, BLA, FASLA, PageSoutherlandPage, Houston, Texas
    Francis S. Oda, D.Arch, FAIA, Group 70 International, Honolulu, Hawaii
    Joshua Jin Pan, MArch, FAIA, JJ Pan and Partners, Taipei, Taiwan
    John Pangrazio, MArch, FAIA, NBBJ, Seattle, Washington
    Bradford Perkins, BArch, FAIA, Perkins Eastman, New York, New York
    John Sheehy, MArch, FAIA, Architecture International, Mill Valley, California
    Ronald L. Skaggs, MArch, FAIA, FACHA, FHFI, HKS, Dallas, Texas
    Laurinda Spear, MArch, FAIA, Arquitectonica, Miami, Florida
    Ted Szostkowski, AIA, Kallman, McKinnell & Wood, Boston, Massachusetts
    Brian T. Takahashi, MArch, Architects Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii
    Carol M. Torigoe, Barch, Kajioka Yamachi Architects, Honolulu, Hawaii
    Phillip White, AIA, Phillip K. White & Associates, Honolulu, Hawaii
    Daniel W. Winey, BArch, MBA, Gensler, San Francisco, California
    Glenn R. Wing, MSArch, AIA, International Asia Pacific Ltd., HASSELL, Hong Kong
    Chung Soo Won, BArch, Hon FAIA, Gansam Partners, Seoul, Korea
    Kenneth K.M. Yeang, PhD, Hon FAIA, TR Hamzah & Yeang, Selangor, Malaysia
    Nachiko Yamamoto, Gensler, Tokyo Japan

  • 09.research
    09.research

    research

    archawai‘i houses three primary research centers that provide curriculum support, information, materials and equipment resources, as well as opportunities for student involvement in basic and applied research.


    CONSTRUCTION PROCESS INNOVATION LAB (CPI) || The Construction Process Innovation Lab creates and disseminates new knowledge in architectural materials, methods, and structures, such to increase value, safety, structural and energy efficiency, and aesthetic/functional quality. The Lab undertakes basic and applied research focused on serving the School, University, and the Asia Pacific region, and gives emphasis to affordable housing in tropical environments.

    Director: Associate Professor David Rockwood


    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & DESIGN LAB || The overarching goal of the SoA Environmental Research & Design Laboratory is to advance sustainable design through research, education, and community outreach, with the aim of improving the dynamic interaction among the built, natural, and human environments. The Lab's primary purpose is to support the school's curriculum and the educational experience of our students. Extra-curricular research activities involve students, support graduate assistantships, bring needed resources and equipment to the school and enhance the studio and the classroom experience and ultimately provide value to the larger community beyond the school's boundaries.

    Director: Associate Professor Stephen Meder, Arch.D.


    HERITAGE CENTER || To promote the preservation of cultural heritage in Hawaii and the Asia Pacific Region by providing expertise, research, documentation, and training opportunities; by disseminating heritage information to the general public; and by increasing interaction and cooperation on heritage issues within the Asia Pacific area between government agencies, non-profits & the general public.

    Director: Professor Spencer Leineweber, FAIA

  • 10.awards + 11.scholarship
    10.awards + 11.scholarship

    awards + scholarships || AWARDS

    ALPHA RHO CHI MEDAL, NATIONAL PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL FRATERNITY AWARD || Since 1914, Alpha Rho Chi, the National Professional Fraternity for Architecture and the Allied Arts, has promoted the profession of architecture by encouraging students to excel. To honor their achievements, the Alpha Rho Chi Medal is offered each year to over one hundred schools of architecture, whose faculty select a graduating senior they feel best exemplifies these qualities.

    In 1931, the Grand Council of Alpha Rho Chi established the Alpha Rho Chi Medal to "encourage professional leadership by rewarding student accomplishment." The Fraternity provides the medal to selected schools of architecture throughout the country to be awarded to the graduating senior who has shown an affinity for leadership, performed willing service for the school or department, and gives promise of real professional merit through his or her attitude and personality. The Alpha Rho Chi Medal is awarded annually to a graduating senior at each NAAB accredited school of architecture, and schools where Alpha Rho Chi chapters exist, and is judged by the faculty of that school of architecture as best exemplifying these qualities.

    The members of Alpha Rho Chi firmly believe strong leaders are just as essential as strong designers to the architectural professions. It is vital to our efforts to produce individuals committed to public service, as well as individuals committed to maintaining Architecture and the Allied Arts as noble professions. We also assert that high scholastic achievement is not necessarily an accurate measure of leadership or service. The Medal commends students who show true professional merit beyond the design studio and their academic career.


    HENRY ADAMS MEDAL + CERTIFICATE, AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS AWARD || Each year The American Institute of Architects awards an engraved medal and certificate of merit to the top-ranking graduating student in each architecture program accredited by the National Architectural Accrediting Board. A certificate of merit is awarded to the second-ranking graduating student. These awards are provided as part of the AIA/AAF Scholarship Program.

    Formerly called "The School Medal", the program began in 1914 and was awarded for "general excellence in architecture throughout the four-year course to graduating students of architecture schools recognized by the Institute." The graduate was later presented with a copy of Mont St. Michel and Chartres, written by Henry Adams. The copyright of this book was later bequeathed to the Institute by the author.

    The Henry Adams Fund was established in 1921 with royalties from the book sales. The fund was used to award a copy of the book "to draftsmen who cannot afford to buy it." The School Medal and Henry Adams book awards evolved into the Henry Adams Medal and Certificate Program. To date the program has honored thousands of students.

    awards + scholarships || SCHOLARSHIPS

    The number of available scholarships varies from year to year depending on the donors, some of whom do not offer their awards on a yearly basis.

    The screening of scholarship applications will be based primarily on the quality of the written proposals and the degree to which the proposal aligns with the purpose of the scholarship. It is therefore of utmost importance that interested applicants communicate their goals, rationale and specific plans as clearly and thoroughly as possible in a thoughtful and well-written proposal. The strength of the applicant's portfolio, the applicant's academic history and financial need will also be carefully considered.

    Students are encouraged to apply for multiple scholarships; however, a specific application must be submitted to each fund. Past scholarship recipients are eligible to reapply as long as they satisfy the published application requirements, however, if any two proposals of equal merit are under consideration, it is likely that award priority will be given to the applicant without previous support or opportunity.

    Most applications are submitted and processed online through the STAR.


    HONOLULU BLUEPRINT AND SUPPLIES (HONBLUE) GRANT || The purpose of this fund is to provide financial support to students who are enrolled in the Doctor of Architecture Program at archawai‘i and have demonstrated skill in design communications. Funds may be used either for costs associated with attendance (tuition, books, fees, etc.), or to conduct out of state studies and/or research. Applicants must be enrolled full-time as undergraduate or graduate students at archawai‘i and have a minimum GPA of 3.0 in architecture coursework.

    CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS INSTITUTE SCHOLARSHIP FUND || The purpose of this fund is to assist students with travel, research expenses or other costs to support in the research of technology as applied to the built environment. Recipients must be enrolled full time as undergraduate/graduate students at archawai‘i. Applicants must have a minimum GPA of 3.0 in architecture coursework and some degree of financial need. Recipient shall present his/her research in a one-hour program to the Honolulu Chapter CSI at a membership meeting.

    DONALD G. DEER MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND || The purpose of this fund is to emphasize and reward community involvement and academic excellence by providing scholarships to students at archawai‘i. It is the donor's wish to recognize and encourage students with potential for future achievement as well as personal qualities of empathy, intellectual curiosity, integrity, motivation, and interpersonal communication skills as demonstrated through a record of community service and volunteerism. The recipient may also be eligible to apply for an internship opportunity with Bonded Materials Company. Applicants must be Hawai‘i residents enrolled full-time in upper-division undergraduate or graduate level coursework with at least a cumulative 3.0 GPA.

    ALLEN R. JOHNSON – ROY C. KELLEY ARCHITECTURAL TRAVEL FUND || The purpose of the award is to encourage and assist students to conduct research off-shore and who are expected to "really get something out of the experience". The donors expressed a wish to see students enrich their understanding and appreciation of architecture through scholarly research and travel and that priority be given to students who have previously had only limited opportunities for travel. Research topics may deal with any aspect of architecture that a student wishes to study and the range of topics has purposely been left open to enable students to pursue research in areas of interest to them and to encourage maximum flexibility and creativity in developing a research proposal. Applicants must have completed the third year design studios at the time the award is distributed and must possess a min. GPA of 3.0 in architecture coursework. For this award, the recipient is required to report back to the school on the experience (such as a public presentation). ¾ of the award will be given before travel, the remaining ¼ will be given after the report.

    SAM CHANG SCHOLARSHIP AT THE SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE || This scholarship was established to assist students at archawai‘i as participants in the international education opportunities. Applicants must be enrolled full-time at archawai‘i, must have a 3.0 GPA or higher in architecture coursework, and must be preparing to study abroad in the next academic year.

    R. RICHARD MORRIS MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP || The purpose of this fund is to assist graduate students in Practicum Studio with any costs related to practicum study, including but not limited to, transportation, travel, research, living expenses and tuition. Applicants must be enrolled full-time in Practicum Studio at archawai‘i in the next academic year and have a minimum 3.0 GPA in architecture coursework.

    UMH SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE PRACTICUM FUND || The purpose of this fund is to provide financial assistance to students attending Practicum Studio, a major component of the Architectural Doctorate degree program that features learning in a leading architect's office. Applicants must be full-time students at archawai‘i who are attending Practicum Studios in the next academic year and have a minimum 3.0 GPA in Architecture coursework.

    UH SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION SCHOLARSHIP || Applicants must be graduates from a Hawai‘i High School, full-time students at archawai‘i, and entering their second year in the program in the next fall semester. The successful applicant will demonstrate promise as a future architect through coursework and community involvement, and by maintaining a minimum 3.0 GPA.

    AIA HONOLULU CHAPTER SCHOLARSHIP || Applicants must be full time students enrolled in a professional degree program accredited by the National Architectural Accrediting Board with at least two years completed in the program. Applications will require a portfolio, an essay, and a letter of recommendation from a faculty member of archawai‘i. Finalists will also have an in-person interview with the AIA Honolulu Chapter Scholarship Committee.

  • 12.affiliation
    12.affiliation

    affiliation

    ADVISORY COUNCIL
    The primary purpose of the Advisory Council is to assist the School in shaping, refining, and achieving its vision, mission, and goals. The Advisory Council will additionally foster closer ties between the School and its stakeholders. To ensure this, the Advisory Council includes, but is not limited to, its alumni and leaders of industries, businesses and organizations that employ its graduates and collaborate with the School's research, education and outreach programs.

    As part of a public university, the School does receive state-funded support. However, the School requires financial and in-kind support beyond these levels if it is to compete internationally with other architecture schools for students, faculty and professional recognition. The Advisory Council helps the School garner this support.

    The Advisory Council facilitates the School's efforts in a number of specific ways:

    A. ENGAGING THE COMMUNITY || The Advisory Council acts as a catalyst in bringing together individuals, organizations, institutions and businesses seeking greater understanding, collaboration, and involvement in higher education, who are capable of expanding opportunities in instruction, research, and outreach programs for the School.

    B. ADVOCACY || The Advisory Council will advocate on behalf of the priorities of the School to university administration, Alumni, Industry, the Hawai‘i Legislature and other internal & external constituencies with which the School wishes to form relations.

    C. FINANCIAL SUPPORT || Fundraising and advocacy are separate functions. The Advisory Council's role in fundraising should be one of endorsement, providing contacts, helping secure financial resources through personal support as well as identifying, cultivating, and soliciting prospective donors. There is an annual commitment of $1500 per member, plus an additional gift of $250 twice per year to support special projects.

    Membership in the Advisory Council will be open to (invited) individuals who demonstrate a commitment to the School by assisting the School in building a strong reputation, assisting in reaching its goals and priorities, and demonstrating a commitment to the School through endorsement, annual giving, endowment support and other opportunities for the benefit of the School. The Advisory council shall consist of not more than sixty (60) active members and not less than fifteen (15) persons. Advisory Council members shall be invited by the Dean and confirmed by the council at the next regularly scheduled meeting.

    Current Advisory Council Members:
    Click HERE to Blog Site

    Christian Bergum, AIA, Christian Bergum & Associates, Victorville, CA
    David Brotman, FAIA, Sunset Consultants, Malibu, CA
    Donald Carlson, FAIA, LEED AP, Seattle, WA
    Byoung Soo Cho, AIA, Byoung Soo Cho Architects, Seoul, S. Korea
    Eric Crispin, AIA, Ohana Real Estate Investors LLC, Honolulu, HI
    S. Fiske Crowell, Jr., FAIA, Sasaki Associates, Boston, MA
    Joseph Ferraro, FAIA, Ferraro Choi & Associates, Ltd, Honolulu, HI
    Marion Fowlkes, FAIA, Centric Architecture, Nashville, TN
    Donald W. Goo, FAIA, Retired, Honolulu, HI
    Ronald P. Gronowski, FAIA, LEED AP BD+C, ZGF Architects, Portland, OR
    Lawrence Heim Jr., Honblue Inc., Honolulu, HI
    Ron Herman, FASLA, Landscape Architect Inc, San Leandro, CA
    Stephan Huh, FAIA, PDI Design Group LLC, Minneapolis, MN
    Rob Iopa, WCIT Architecture, Honolulu, HI
    Ma Ry Kim-Johnson, Gensler, London, UK
    Allan Kehrt, FAIA, KSS Architects LLP, Princeton, NJ
    Donald King, FAIA, DKA Architecture, Seattle, WA
    Randy Lau, Designer Built Systems Inc, Waipahu, HI
    Richard C. Lessard, AIA, NCARB, Lessard Collaborative, LLC, Sperryville, VA
    Geoffrey Lewis, AIA, Geoffrey Lewis Architect Inc, Honolulu, HI
    Robert H. Liljestrand, Retired, Honolulu, HI
    David Miller, AIA, Architects Hawaii Ltd., Honolulu, HI
    Dwight Mitsunaga, AIA, ARCH D, NCARB, Pacific Architects Inc, Honolulu, HI
    Sanford Murata, Sanford Murata, Inc., Honolulu, HI
    Patrick Onishi, AIA, Honolulu, HI
    Yolanda Reyes, FAIA, YDR Design & Planning Consultants, Manila, Philippines
    Sheryl Seaman, AIA, ASID, LEED AP, Group 70 International, Honolulu, HI
    Elizabeth Stewart, The American Institute Of Architects, Washington, DC
    Susan Szenasy, Metropolis, New York, NY
    Hian-Ka Tjen, MSIA, IAI, RIBA, SAA Architects Pte Ltd, Singapore
    A. Kimbal Thompson, AIA, TF, LEED AP, AKTA LTD. Architects, Kaneohe, HI
    Peter Vincent, AIA, NCARB, Peter Vincent Architects, Honolulu, HI
    Ed Weinstein, FAIA, Weinstein A|U Architects and Urban Designers, Seattle, WA
    Homer Williams, FAIA, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI
    Thomas S. Witten, ASLA, PBR Hawaii & Associates, Honolulu, HI
    Cynthia Xin Xu, LEED-AP, USAE Alliance, Shanghai, China
    Gary Yee, SSFM International, Honolulu, HI

    AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTURE STUDENTS (AIAS)
    The mission of the AIAS is to promote excellence in architecture education, training and practice; to foster an appreciation of architecture and related disciplines; to enrich communities in a spirit of collaboration; and to organize architecture students and combine their efforts to advance the art and science of architecture.


    GAMMA MU CHAPTER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA
    The Tau Sigma Delta national honor society was established in 1913. The mission of the organization is to provide a national collegiate honor society open to students of all American colleges and universities, where in an accredited program of Architecture, Landscape Architecture, Interior Design, Planning and the Allied Arts is established. The prime objective is to celebrate excellence in scholarship, to stimulate mental achievement and to award those students who attain high scholastic. The Gamma Mu Chapter of the University of Hawai'i welcomes the interest and input of fellow architecture students concerning academic assistance, peer encouragement, special events and lectures, and setting and achieving goals.

    Requirements for Entry: A minimum GPA of 3.0 on a 4.0 scale; and in the upper 20% of your class.


    UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I ALUMNI ASSOCIATION (UHSAAA)
    The mission of the UHSAAA is to enrich the university experience, foster fellowship and achieve educational excellence by challenging and supporting the university through the interaction of the alumni, school and community For more information or to join, please visit http://uhsaaa.org/.

  • 13.development
    13.development

    development || SUPPORT THE SCHOOL

    Private support is very important to archawai‘i. Many of our alumni & friends have made contributions to the school over the years. Private support to the Architecture Development Fund support research and travel scholarships; student activities; alumni events; computer lab; faculty development; distinguished/visiting lecture program; Asia Pacific Architecture Symposium; library, gallery, newsletter & outreach activities; and in some way have assisted ever facet of the school's education and service programs. There are many ways to support the School. All offer tax or estate-planning advantages that may be useful to donors.

    OUTRIGHT GIFTS || An outright gift is a direct transfer of an asset to archawai‘i. Outright gifts may be made with cash, securities, stock, a life insurance policy, real estate and personal property. Gifts of this kind produce an even greater benefit to the donor because of capital gains tax savings.

    PLANNED GIVING || In addition to outright giving, "planned giving" is an exciting way to fulfill philanthropic goals, because a "planned gift" provides not only a gift in support of archawai‘i but also multiple financial and tax benefits to the donor and his or her family. For example, a donor may transfer cash or property to the UH Foundation and, in return, receive fixed, lifetime income payments, provide fixed, lifetime income payments to a family member or friend, and enjoy a sizeable income tax deduction. After the passing of the donor(s), any remaining gift value will be used to benefit the University of Hawai‘i for a win-win-win gift!

    For more information about supporting the School, please contact our gift officer, Harriet Cintron at 808.956.3594 or Harriet.Cintron@uhfoundation.org.

  • 14.gallery
    14.gallery

    gallery || STUDENT WORK

    2010-2011

    coming soon...

    2011

    ARCH 569 - SEOUL STUDIO



    2008-2009

    ARCH 101 - BASIC ARCHITECTURE STUDIO
    Human Body Sculpture by John Paolo Soriano and Deanna K. Chang, Fall 2008.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || Clone and Cocoon - The clone is to create a condition of direct human interaction with the guest entering a space or building premise. With this dialogue, the clone manifests a sence of hospitality to the human guest. The cocoon is to iterate the dynamic gesture of the arms and legs creating a space within a space scenario.
    ARCH 341 - INTERMEDIATE ARCHITECTURE STUDIO A
    A House in Kaneohe by Jan Erika Flomata, Fall 2008.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || Exploring the idea of water cycle as it flows into the different spaces of the earth. The circulation and each space of the house represent the different spaces of the earth the water flows into.
    ARCH 342 - INTERMEDIATE ARCHITECTURE STUDIO B
    Barack Obama Presidential Library by Chrentien Macutay, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || President Obama's life consists of a continuing journey starting from a humble upbringing to his new role as the President of the United States of America. This Presidential Library humbly rises from the grounds of Kaka'ako and climbs to a position of prominence, representing his accomplished past whilst setting a platform for his plans for a prosperous future in America.
    Barack Obama Presidential Library by Jan Erika Flomata, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || Expressing the vital topics that President Obama included in his inaugural speech and how he pursued his political goals and vision for the future of the United States of America; providing a landmark in Honolulu, and to raising cultural awareness to the people inside and outside Hawai‘i.
    ARCH 415 - CONCENTRATION ARCHITECTURE STUDIO
    Reshaping Urban Public Spaces in Waikiki by Anna Togias, Fall 2008.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || Site selection was based upon analysis of four urban zones in Honolulu. Selection: A commercial strip; a neglected leftover void within the urban fabric of Waikīkī, emphasizing my concept of designing experiences between buildings not merely in them. Theoretically derived from conditions of flux in, on, and around the site, mainly dealing with connecting urban spaces on various vertical instances.
    ARCH 541 - ARCHITECTURE STUDIO II
    Waikiki Church by Yukihiro Yamaguchi, Fall 2008.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || Openness - The existing church give us conservative space. It may came from religious idea, or architectural idea in Europe. Through the great contribution of father Damien, I am impressed with his openness or leniency for the Hawaiian. I propose the new church has more open space for the people and environment.
    Waikiki Church by Kloe Kang, Fall 2008.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || The focus of the design was to create a place/space that evokes a sense of religious blessings and the light of devotion that Father Damien has humbly made for the Kalaupapa patients. It also emphasizes the sustainable aspects, utilizing natural lights and Northeast trade wind, vegetation, traffic patterns, and the natural environment that is inherent in historic Waikiki site.
    Urban Design for the Kaka‘ako Area by Megdlin Clay Reagan, Fall 2008.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || Hawai‘i is in desperate need of coastline restitution. The native Hawaiians developed a method of creating a symbiotic relationship with their natural environment because they understood that without the oceans, rivers and the earth they would not survive. In an effort to rekindle an appreciation and recognition of Hawai'i's natural ecology nature must be brought into the urban environment instead of separating them as though one has nothing to do with the other. I have chosen to place a natural hawaiian habitat where endangered birds, fish, fresh water and plants can thrive back in the place they were once removed from; the urban coastline.
    Urban Design for the Kaka‘ako Area by Troy Okimoto, Jason Takeuchi,
    and Rebecca Weatherford, Fall 2008.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || Global warming will transform O‘ahu's shores. Because of the challenges and changes that will occur over the past century, the invention of new ideas, technologies and systems are essential. Mountain dwellings, vertical farming, fish aquaculture farms, bioremediation islands and tide technology will facilitate a new lifestyle for O‘ahu residents.
    ARCH 542 - ARCHITECTURE STUDIO III
    A Building in the Expansion of Shousheng Temple, Zhejiang Province, China
    by Christopher Hayler, Fall 2008.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || The Auditorium design concept was based on Buddhist ideas about levels of enlightenment and the meditative value of emptiness. A person entering the auditorium would physically climb upwards to reach the place of meditation and focus on a window that faced the sky to meditate.
    A Building in the Expansion of Shousheng Temple, Zhejiang Province, China
    by Kyung Joon Chung, Fall 2008.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || The circle structures emptiness harboring tranquil water. The Bodhi tree, under which Buddha attained nirvana, emerges from the water & becomes an intense focus for meditation. The meditation space of each unit links the indoor to the outdoor, where impermanent phenomena of the water, the tree, and the sunlight harmonize to create a sacred space within the mind.
    Honolulu Regeneration by Richard Rivera, Fall 2008.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || Modernized to fit the program of a "digital library," a mediatheque is proposed as the new mauka gateway to Fort Street Mall. Located on what was once a park, fragmentation of the building mass maintains the essence of openness, scale and wonder. Translucency allows the mediatheque to glow like a lantern – symbolizing education, work, and change – in the busy Downtown + Chinatown district of Honolulu.
    Honolulu Regeneration by Joni Ablay, Michelle Cheang, Fran Palama,
    Justin Szajnecki, and Jonathan Yabiku, Fall 2008.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || The proposal for the Ala Wai Boat Harbor area was to use a linear park that wrapped its way around the site as a catalyst for urban renewal. The proposal was based on the idea of community connectivity, to bring locals and tourists together to share their experience of a revitalized focal point within a mature community like Waikiki.
    Transit Oriented Development in Waipahu by Jenny Lei and Joyce Nip, Fall 2008.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || The concept of the 'Exploratorium' is to create a family oriented destination with amenities such as the lifestyle center, entertainment hub, and the art district. These functions embrace various outdoor activity spaces, providing safe environments for young families to play. The lifestyle center illustrates the idea of live, work, and play. Touch sensitive L.E.D. panels are incorporated into the center to promote interactive and remarkable experiences.
    Transit Oriented Development in Waipahu by Allysa Taylor, Andrew Shaw,
    and Carla Dal Santo, Fall 2008.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || Two natural canals drain from the mountains into Pearl Harbor's West Loch near the proposed Leoku Street station, but it is currently a monofunctional industrial area that lacks beauty and comfort. Taking advantage of this natural system, we incorporated water throughout the site and restored the original wetlands that once existed, creating a cleaner, educational, mixed-use, multifunctional community.
    ACSA Salk Institute Expansion Competition by Peter Laura, Brian Makanoa,
    and Kalani Pahoa, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || The concept is the cycle of order and chaos. This is not the dichotomy of order and chaos, but the cyclical nature of order and simplicity moving into chaos and complexity. This concept originated from Kahn's building designs and the site. The architecture expresses a clear order on a rugged natural site. The major site elements are the strong axis lines which transverse it. Kahn's buildings, due to the exacting geometries, became synonymous for order. In addition, there exists a strong emphasis on the horizon and the sky. Our concept incorporates the strong pull towards the ground with the ravine. The western untouched portion of the site emanates a strong sense of the wildness in nature, or chaos.
    ACSA Salk Institute Expansion Competition by Yuhei Miyaki, Dayton Wong,
    and Yukihiro Yamaguchi, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || "Invisible Bridge" is the invisible medium that connects two things. In Kahn's courtyard you feel close to the ocean because the human sight line is at the horizon and the building frames the sea. It is not a physical, but a spiritual connection. We explored this phenomenon in our buildings to create a connection between people, nature and Kahn's building.
    Design for a Mixed-use Project in Waikiki by Hong Joon Yang, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || The project started from constrain of economic structure in O‘ahu that is strongly biased to tourism. The key skeleton of concept is to construct an economic stability by making job diversity with cultural network. Site was redefined by synapse that has a potential to intercede a space that has two different characters throughout the analogical process from site landscape.
    Design for a Mixed-use Project in Waikiki by Sun Lin Goh, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || Growth of an island, a floating city inspired by the green paths left by past lava flows on the mountains. Pushing these greenscape fingers out onto the ocean to jut out from Kapiolani Park, forming a promenade of functional spaces onto the ocean, a transformation from organic to manmade. The rebirth and regeneration of the decay of the cityscape Waikiki.
    ARCH 542/544 - ARCHITECTURE STUDIO III AND V
    Honolulu Zoo Redevelopment by Amber Abinsay, Ardison Garcia, Raquel Gushi,
    Richard Rivera, and Queentie Leung, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || The Honolulu Zoo Redevelopment engages the public to the zoo by "breaking boundaries" at its edges. A multi-use complex was designed to create a dynamic and eco-chic experience on different areas of the site through elevated public paths and nodes. The Honolulu Zoo Complex is comprised of a Water Center, Learning Center, Aviary, and Zoo Mall.
    ARCH 544 - ARCHITECTURE STUDIO V
    Housing at 2002 Vancouver Drive, Honolulu by Tod Gushiken, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || Design five single-family dwellings that utilize building forms to define space. Large open areas are created on the side of each unit and are further expanded by the courtyard space central to each house. Landscaping is represented in a vertical fashion along the concrete walls. These green walls provide privacy and allow the other three sides of each unit (with the exception of one) to have largely open facades.
    Housing at 2002 Vancouver Drive, Honolulu by Joyce Nip, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || The design aims to create a safe and secure living community for the residents. A central axis denoting the primary entrance into the site and the outdoor courtyard onward evokes a great sense of arrival. The perimeter of the site is transformed into a looping pedestrian domain with pockets of garden spaces for relaxation and play.
    ARCH 533 - ADVANCED DESIGN COMMUNICATION II
    A Prototypical Bus Stop in Mānoa by Kody Kato, Fall 2008.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || In philosophy, truth is defined as a process of verification. The rise of the 21st century and post modernism marks a period where social interaction diminishes and individualization awakens. In doing so, it represents a shift in social behavior that results in the decomposition and deterioration of social cohesion. In other words, individualization is a direct result of modernization that detaches individuals from traditional life processes. This design synthesis investigates mathematical representations derived from social and hyperbolic relationships to develop a shape grammar—where the shape grammar is designed at different scales to form the structure of the bus stop.
    A Prototypical Bus Stop in Mānoa by Kanoa Chung, Fall 2008.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || The project explores the use of bus site activity as a generative device, translating motion density to physical form. A series of motion maps representing various activity groupings are applied to the faces of the sites existing structure and then extruded based on their densities. The resultant form is then modified to accommodate standard bus stop functions.
    ARCH 490/690 - DIGITAL DESIGN SYNTHESIS
    Digital Design Synthesis of an Abstract Form by Kyung Joon Chung, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || Emerging means of digital techniques are now exploring the diversity in architecture serving as the medium for the architect to define what can be designed, and built, radically transforming the way architecture is conceived, designed, and produced. NURBs modeling, parametric & generative geometry, digital design fabrication and algorithmic architecture are the topics investigated for explorations for innovative ideas.
    Digital Design Synthesis for a Chair by Ardison Garcia, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || The skin of a chameleon changes according to its surroundings and psychological conditions. The cells, chromatophores, lie under their outer skin. I used this concept to design the Chameleon Chair. Using Rhino and Grasshopper, I used the average weight values to adjust perforations according to structural need. The form was also created using ergonomic case studies of previous chair designs.
    ARCH 490/690 - FURNITURE DESIGN & FABRICATION
    Design and Fabrication of a Chair by Andy W.F. Lau, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || The exterior/interior contrast of a geode is expressed in the chair's design. The exterior "shell" of the chair serves the most basic function of seating. It is deliberately left neutral and painted gray. The steel rods at the interior of the shell make up the chair's structure and serve as book storage. It is expressed in a bright red-orange color.
    Design and Fabrication of a Chair by Alana Aviel, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || The desire was to create a chair that could be comfortable as a pivotable seated chair as well as a lounge position chair. To achieve multiple positions, simplistic pivots as well as stops were implemented to resolve structural needs in more than one position. The aesthetic goal was to have a geometry reflected in the leg system as well as the seat.
    ARCH 490/690 - RHYTHM IN STRUCTURE
    School of Architecture Courtyard Redesign by Donald Kyle Quilinquin, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || An instinctual shading design to bring people to the core of the School of Architecture circulation system: the Courtyard. The design's fluid movement through the air wraps the visitor with a light embrace. Like a heartbeat, the intense rhythm is used to draw a person to the courtyard, filled with curiosity, inducing an impulse to see how it is made.
    School of Architecture Courtyard Redesign by George Patrick Raco, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || So I run far away, No place in mind. I just follow my dreams, leaving the day far behind. Was it a place that exists only in my dreams? What's this place for, and what does it mean?
    ARCH 526 - ARCHITECTURE SYSTEM V: INTEGRATION
    School of Architecture to Sinclair by Shao Yu Lin, Eric Siwy, Yishan Fu,
    Raquel Gushi, and Reid Okanehu, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || An instinctual shading design to bring people to the core of the School of Architecture circulation system: the Courtyard. The design's fluid movement through the air wraps the visitor with a light embrace. Like a heartbeat, the intense rhythm is used to draw a person to the courtyard, filled with curiosity, inducing an impulse to see how it is made.
    School of Architecture to Sinclair by Ardison Garcia, Tod Gushiken, Noryn Lau, Jack Kuo,
    Sandro Sasaki, and Leia Calandria, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || Increase campus interaction within the School of Architecture. Establish the School of Architecture building as an Architectural icon on Campus. Develop students learning of structural engineering through the Building Concept.
    ARCH 546/548 - DOCTORATE PROJECT I AND II
    Perception in Motion: Video as a Design Tool by Amber Vierra, Spring 2009.
    DESIGN CONCEPT || The experience of cities is largely determined by the organization of transport networks. Although ordering a city based on speed and modal type is valid, is it possible for the experience of speed and motion to alter cities? This doctoral project introduces perception in motion as a design method for grounded transport networks and uses film to provide an understanding of the Honolulu transit experience.

  • 15.news
    15.news

    news

    Faculty Search Candidates

    Jason Vollen schedule
    Dragoslav Simic schedule
    FACULTY SEARCH Schedule May 10 to 15
    FACULTY SEARCH Schedule

    Edson G. Cabalfin CV
    Dragoslav Simic CV
    Martin Despang CV
    Lance Walters CV
    Judith Stilgenbauer CV
    Soheil A. Rastan CV
    Richard L. Hindle CV
    Maria Simon CV
    Mary G. Padua CV


    Randy Swanson CV

    04.27.2012

    ERDL Wins the 2012 Student Employee of the Year Team Award

    The University of Hawaii School of Architecture’s Environmental Research and Design Lab (ERDL) team was nominated for the 2012 Student Employee of the Year (SEOTY) team award by Mark Gilbert, UH Manoa Campus Planner, and Stephen Meder, UH Sea Grant Center for Smart Building and Community Design Director, UH Manoa Assistant Vice Chancellor of Campus Planning. These students were recognized for their individual and collective diligence, creativity, commitment, and overall excellence as student employees and members of the campus community.

    ERDL student employees and support staff include:
    Carlos Lopez, Christopher Strahle, Dayna Vierra, Deirdre Zoder, Eric Dela Cruz, Filipe Palma, John Paolo Soriano, Joseph Furutani, Kim Jordan Cayanan, Lindsay Wong, Lori Walker, Ren Shiroma, Ria Lyn Mitchell, Sanphawat Jatupatwarangkul, Ajala Kenyatta, Micah Thrasher, Troy Okimoto, Somers Reid

    Congratulations!


    04.27.2012

    Fabrication Shop - Making it REAL


    The ArcHawaii Fabrication Shop offers students the chance to put their design ideas to the test - in the real world, at real scale. The Shop hosts a complete range of traditional woodworking tools as well as CNC Routing, Laser Cutting and 3D Printing. Here you can make it real!

    ArcHawaii Fabrication Shop supports a variety of required courses including ARCH 317 Structural Material Systems A : Wood, ARCH 518 Advanced Systems, and studio courses of all levels. In addition, a number of elective courses have necessitated student use of the Shop, including ARCH 405 Selected Design Studio: Furniture Design. The Shop is open six days a week.

    The Shop is located on the first level, and is comprised of approximately 2,400 square feet of space. The Shop is open to a covered and uncovered adjoining outdoor work area. The Shop is divided into a machine/bench room, digital machining room, materials storage, tool crib and office. The primary focus of the Shop is to allow a variety of objects – from models to full-scale construction – to be constructed in wood. However, the Shop also supports work in a variety of other materials including plastics, composites, and metals.

    The Shop contains the following equipment for use by students:
    10” Delta Table Uni-saw
    10” SawStop Table Saw
    4” Precision Model-Maker’s Table Saw
    Router Table
    4’ x 10’ Panel saw
    14” Band saw
    10” Festool Compound Miter Saw
    10” Power miter saw
    12” Disk sander
    18” Drum sander
    Oscillating spindle sander
    Grinder/Polishing wheel
    Work Sharp Sharpening System
    6” Jointer
    15” Surface plainer
    Hollow Chisel Mortising Machine
    Adjustable axial drill press
    Vertical drill press
    50 gal. Air Compressor with 100ft. air hose and pneumatic Nail gun
    Vacuum Press Sytem
    Steam Bending System
    120 Watt 24” x 36” Universal Laser Systems Laser Cutter
    48” x 96” Techno CNC Router
    Festool Domino Mortising System
    Festool Precision Circular Saw
    Festool Portable Dust Collector
    Various small power tools such as router, skill saw, grinders, etc.
    Various types of jigs, for use with their appropriate machinery
    Extensive set of hand tools

    04.12.2012

    PRACTICUM: A Unique Student Opportunity
    The Practicum Program allows students an opportunity to interact with prestigious architectural firms throughout the world. This enables students to gain the skills necessary for leadership in practice and at the same time to start accumulating credits for IDP. The Practicum Firms are represented by Adjunct Faculty members who are principals in these select organizations and their direct supervision provides a memorable and valuable experience for UH School of Architecture students. For a deeper understanding and further information on Archawaii's Practicum Program please review the syllabus below.

    1. NO & TITLE: ARCH 547P Professional Studio - Practicum

    2. COURSE DESCRIPTION: (UHM Catalog) Scholarly and research activity integrated into a professional office environment occurring in an off-campus location.

    3. PREREQUISITES: ARCH 544, ARCH 545, ARCH 546

    4. CREDITS: 12 Semester Hours.

    5. GRADING: A-F

    6. NAAB STUDENT PERFORMANCE CRITERIA:
    C.1 Collaboration: Ability to work in collaboration with others and in multidisciplinary teams to successfully complete design projects.
    C.3 Client Role in Architecture: Understanding of the responsibility f the architect to elicit, understand, and reconcile the needs of the client, owner, user groups, and the public and community domains.
    C.4 Project Management: Understanding of the methods for competing for commissions, selecting consultants and assembling teams, and recommending project delivery methods.
    C.5 Practice Management: Understanding of the basic principles of architectural practice management such as financial management and business planning, time management, risk management, mediation and arbitration, and recognizing trends that affect practice.
    C.6 Leadership: Understanding of the techniques and skills architects use to work collaboratively in the building design and construction process and on environmental, social, and aesthetic issues in their communities.
    C.7 Legal Responsibilities: Understanding of the architect's responsibility to the public and the client as determined by registration law, building codes and regulations, professional service contracts, zoning and subdivision ordinances, environmental regulation, and historic preservation and accessibility laws.
    C.8 Ethics and Professional Judgment: Understanding of the ethical issues involved in the formation of professional judgment regarding social, political and cultural issues in architectural design and practice.
    C.9 Community and Social Responsibility: Understanding of the architect's responsibility to work in the public interest, to respect historic resources, and to improve the quality of life for local and global neighbors.

    7. ORGANIZATION/COURSE OVERVIEW: Students enrolled in the D.Arch. Program are required to complete one Professional Studio (12 credits) and may elect to enroll in additional Professional Studio courses for up to 12 additional credits. Arch 547P Professional Studio – Practicum is one of three Professional Studios offered. Students are required to attend orientation sessions two semesters prior to placement in a Practicum Studio.

    The Practicum integrates theory, practice, and research in a comprehensive manner in a professional office study environment. The term” professional” in this context is broadly defined, and it is a goal of the course to engage in a critique and an expansion of how professional design may be conceived and practiced now and in the future. Emphasis is given to developing the core skills of leadership, critical thinking and cultural understanding. The course is an important means of realizing the School’s Mission which states, “The School of Architecture offers a global collaborative approach to improving the built and natural environment founded on intellectual inquiry, creative problem solving, and outreach with a commitment to prominence in innovative architectural education, design excellence, sustainability, and research with a focus on Hawaii, the Pacific, and Asia.”

    Students are placed in a professional office (“Practicum Firm”) that has experience working in the geographic and cultural milieu stated in the School’s Mission. Students may elect to accrue National Council of Architectural Registration Board (NCARB) Intern Development Program (IDP) academic credit simultaneously with academic credit.

    Each student’s primary instructor (“Practicum Faculty”) is a practicing registered architect, a Practicum Firm principal who is an appointed SoA Adjunct Professor. He/she is required to provide the student access to the firm’s resources, client and management meetings and leadership exposure. Practicum Firm members designated by the Practicum Faculty as “Unit Mentors” guide the daily training and research tasks in the office. The Practicum Coordinator is the SoA instructor who assesses the student academic performance. The student’s responsibility is to initiate all work and engage the Practicum Faculty, Unit Mentors, and Practicum Coordinator in mutually-beneficial dialogue.

    The focus of the Practicum course is multi-fold The student will 1) develop a research project in collaboration with the Practicum Faculty and Firm 2) undertake professional practice Competency Unit Assignments 3)engage in a semester long community service activity 4) record critical reflection in written Weekly Progress Reports and a daily Journal. 5) enjoy cultural activities in the city where the firm is located. Students are placed in firms to experience actual practice activities AND complete academic reflections beyond office hours as ‘homework’. Thus their role differs from that of a typical intern. It is highly recommended that the Practicum Faculty and student communicate such difference to members of the Practicum Firm.

    8. ASSIGNMENTS:
    (a) Proficiency Unit Assignments (Note: For the purpose of the course, Proficiency Units are equivalent to IDP Core Competencies.)

    A minimum of thirty two (32) hours per week must be devoted to practical experience activities in the firm under the guidance of the Practicum Faculty and Unit Mentors. An additional minimum of thirty two (32) hours per week must be devoted to academic ‘homework’ to translate practical experience via critical thinking analysis into written reflections and research documentation.

    The Practicum Firm’s need for flexibility must be balanced with the student’s need to engage meaningfully in the practice experience and related scholarly/research activities. Proficiency Units may be overlapped or combined, varied in the amount of time they are engaged (typically from one to three weeks), or offered in a different order, as determined by the Practicum Faculty in consultation with the student. *Please note that 14 Project Management, 15 Office Management, and 16 Professional and Community Service are required. Students must select a minimum of three (3) additional units to focus on selected from the list below thus are required to complete a total of six (6) Proficiency Units.

    1 Programming
    2 Site and Environmental Analysis
    3 Schematic Design
    4 Engineering Systems Coordination
    5 Building Cost Analysis
    6 Code Research
    7 Design Development
    8 Construction Documents
    9 Specifications and Material Research
    10 Document Checking and Coordination
    11 Bidding and Contract Negotiation
    12 Construction Phase - Office
    13 Construction Phase – Observation
    14* Project Management
    15* Office Management
    16* Professional and Community Service (See details in (c) below)

    Each Proficiency Unit Assignment must conform to the following guidelines: (a) include detailed description of all projects undertaken and activities performed, (b) include critical appraisal of the activities performed, (c) offer unique insights into the nature of the activities as a phase of work relating to overall firm and project goals with specific metrics indicated when appropriate, (d) be neatly typed and proof read, use MS Word format with 10 to 12 point font, and comprise between 3 to 10 double spaced pages of text and supplemental images and graphics to support the writing.

    (b) Research Project
    One comprehensive research project of interest to the student, Practicum Faculty and Practicum Firm is required. The topic, purpose, schedule, methodology, and final products are to be specified by the student in consultation with the Practicum Faculty and the Practicum Coordinator. The research topic should be related to the student’s Doctorate Project research, but not just be research that should have been accomplished as part of the D.Arch I. It should include evidence of findings with clarity as to why, how it supplements the D.Arch. Research. The main ideas should be contained in a research pre-proposal which should be complete and ready to be discussed at the first meeting with the Practicum Faculty. The final proposal should be developed through discussion with the Practicum Faculty and submitted no later than the end of the second week of classes. A formal presentation of the Research Project to the Practicum Firm is required at the end of the semester.

    Submission requirements for the research document include a mid-semester draft of the research at the end of the eighth week of the semester and final submittal to the Practicum Faculty and the Practicum Coordinator. Both the mid-semester and final submittals of the research document are required to include hypothesis, methodology, findings, process, schedule, and bibliographic information. Research in this context is broadly defined and may include issues of design, construction, case studies, building performance evaluation, material and construction investigations, etc. The final research document should be a minimum of 10 pages of text with additional pages for illustrations.

    (c) Professional/Community Service Activity
    One semester long volunteer participation in a service activity is required in the Practicum Firm’s local community. A minimum of 30 hours of active participation is expected. Activities should be selected based on their potential to allow sustained, not piecemeal, involvement. Suggested activities, preferably architecture-related, include but are not limited to:

     Service on a committee or community service activity of a professional association.
     Conduct educational program about the profession in elementary or secondary schools
     Participation in civic organizations or neighborhood groups.
    A mid-semester draft of the activity should be submitted at the end of the eighth week and a minimum 7 page illustrated report detailing contributions made and lessons learned from the involvement must be submitted to the Practicum Faculty and Practicum Coordinator.

    (d) Daily Journal/Weekly Progress Report Daily entries in a journal are required and should be critical reflections on activities completed in the Practicum Firm, as well as during research, community service, and personal enrichment activities. Free hand sketches and diagrams, images, copies of references used, and photos of student in action with Practicum Faculty, Mentors and other participants is highly encouraged to be included. Scanned images of pages excerpted from and representative of typical daily entries are to be submitted along with the Weekly Progress Report. The actual journal must be submitted as part of the final course submittal.

    A Weekly Progress Report summarizing weekly activity is required. Reports should include but not be limited to progress made on any of the assignments a-d, and should include names and roles of people the student has met or collaborated with; titles and descriptions of references and publications related to any assignments; subject of lectures or presentations attended. In some cases attachments of meeting memos rather than a rewritten recap may be submitted for expedience. The Progress Reports should be submitted to the Practicum Faculty during weekly consultation meetings as well as to the Practicum Coordinator via Laulima per required dates, usually the Sunday of the following week. Sketches, images and diagrams from daily journal should be included in the progress report.

    (e) Firm wide Presentations
    Students are required to introduce themselves to the firm within the first two weeks of their arrival via a presentation to the firm at large that clarifies their role as Practicum Student and describes their research topic. It should include their academic, professional and cultural background.

    A formal presentation of the research findings is required no later than Wednesday of final exam week and should be arranged in concert with the Practicum Faculty and firm schedule. It should be concise yet comprehensive and could include descriptions of the student’s overall experience. The presentation should allow time for questions and dialogue with the audience and a proper thank you to everyone.

    9. SCHEDULE:
    The Practicum follows the regular UHM academic calendar. The student should be active within the Practicum Firm by the start of classes, and complete all activities on the last day of finals unless other arrangements are made and approved by the Practicum Faculty and Practicum Coordinator. The student should present their Research Project findings to the Practicum Firm during Final Exam Week, (no later than Wednesday of that week). Mid-semester assignments should be reviewed no later than the eighth week and submitted the next week. Suggested semester schedule follows


    10. ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSIONS
    Assignments are due according to the course schedule. All assignments must be submitted as WORD or PDF electronic files to the Practicum Faculty and copied to the Practicum Coordinator at the appropriate Laulima site. All assignments must be completed and submitted on the respective due dates. Files are to be submitted using the following file title format for the respective assignments:

    lastnameFIRSTINITIAL_prof_unit01_semesteryear (example: smithR_prof_unit01_spring10)
    lastnameFIRSTINITIAL_research_draft_semesteryear
    lastnameFIRSTINITIAL_research_final_semesteryear
    lastnameFIRSTINITIAL_journal_progress_wk1_semesteryear
    lastnameFIRSTINITIAL_service_draft_semesteryear
    lastnameFIRSTINITIAL_service_final_semesteryear
    lastnameFIRSTINITIAL_intropresentation_semesteryear
    lastnameFIRSTINITIAL_finalpresentation_semesteryear
    lastnameFIRSTINITIAL_evaluations_semesteryrear

    A CD as well as a binder containing all files, handouts, and documents for all assignments must be sent to: Joyce M. Noe, FAIA, and Practicum Coordinator
    School of Architecture University of Hawaii at Manoa
    2410 campus Road; Honolulu, HI 96822 U.S.A.
    Both must be received by the Monday following Final Exam Week. US Postal Service Flat rate box for priority mailing is most economical.

    11. TEXTBOOKS:
    Readings are established by the student in consultation with the Practicum Faculty and (if applicable) the Practicum Coordinator.

    12. INTERN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (IDP) Credit:
    Students may elect to earn IDP credit. If a student so elects, he/she should meet with the Practicum Faculty at the start of the semester to establish a NCARB Council Record (see www.ncarb.org/idp ), develop a plan for IDP, and integrate the IDP credit work with scholarly work. IDP training requires a minimum of 32 hours per week in the office and an agreement with NCARB requires scholarly assignments done for academic credit to be completed outside office hours.

    13. GRADING:
    (a) The final course letter grades will be determined by the Practicum Coordinator in consultation with the Practicum Faculty, from a weighted average of the following. Please note that 50% of the grade reflects student performance in professional practice at the firm and 50% research and assignments as academic ‘homework’ after work hours.
    35% Proficiency Unit Assignments [Including Introductory Presentation]
    15% Weekly Progress Report and Journal [Including scanned sketches, notes from journal]
    35% Research Project Assignment [Including Final Presentation]
    15% Professional/Community Service Assignment

    (b) Grading: Letter grades: A=Excellent, B=Good, C=Average, D=Poor, F=Unacceptable/Fail.
    If submitted work is found unacceptable the Practicum Faculty and/or Coordinator/Instructor is to advise the student on what is required to bring it up to an acceptable passing level.

    A grade of Incomplete or “I” is recorded only in those instances where the student is unable to complete all work to an acceptable level through circumstances that are beyond his or her control. Typically, this would involve an extended illness of the student or in the student’s immediate family that prevents the timely completion of required coursework.

    (c) Grade Submission: Practicum Faculty and Mentors should submit their recommendation for the student’s Proficiency Unit, Midterm Evaluation and grade, and Final course evaluation and grade to the Practicum Coordinator no later than the end of Final Exam Week. The Practicum Coordinator determines the Final Grade

    14. EVALUATIONS:
    Students are required to submit an end of the semester evaluation of the Practicum Faculty and Practicum Firm using the form provided.

    Practicum Faculty are required to submit an evaluation of the student at mid-semester and at the end of the semester using the form provided. Comments and a letter grade are required. The Practicum Faculty should meet with the student to discuss performance prior to submitting their final assessment as part of the evaluation process.

    Unit Mentors are required to submit evaluations of the student for each Proficiency Unit Assignment completed at mid-semester and at the end of the semester using the form provided.

    15. UHM/SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES:
    (a) The course will follow current University of Hawaii and School of Architecture Policies and Procedures and all students are expected to be familiar with and abide by these Policies and Procedures.

    03.19.2012

    STUDIO AT THE BEACH!
    This year AIAS Hawaii proudly hosted the 35th Annual Great Hawaiian Sandcastle Esquisse. The theme was a throwback to the original: Castles. With eighteen teams competing at Kailua Beach Park, the competition was fierce. There were six professional teams, including one team representing University of Hawaii at Manoa's very own faculty and staff from the school of architecture. The five award winning categories up for grabs were: Most Original, Best Use of Material, Structurally Challenging, Best Overall Student Team and Best Overall Professional Team. Although there were five categories, three teams managed to sweep the five categories. Most Original Castle went to team Brust'n composed of four second year studio-mates: Ryan Ching, Taylor Cook, Brandon Large and Justin Wong. Best Use of Material and Best Overall Student Castle was won by the Sand Beavers, a team comprised of only three students: Natalie Park, Mike Hill and Diane Buchwalder, all of whom have a non-pre-professional undergraduate degree and are currently enrolled in the first semester of the 3 1/2 yr. D. Arch. program at the University of Hawaii. The Structurally Challenging Award and Best Overall Professional Castle went to a rookie team from Layton Construction and Group 70 International, team members were Mike Cook, Dale Keep, Dawn Peterson and Jeff Peterson.

    Following the competition, as always, there was plenty of food for all and waves and sunshine on the beach. There’s nothing quite like a day at the beach when you have practicing and aspiring architects working "hard" playing in the sand.




    03.12.2012

    2nd PLACE AT URBAN SOS
    Urban SOS is an annual student competition created to engage students in the fields of urban planning and design, architecture, landscape architecture and engineering with the issues confronting modern cities and to foster a cross-disciplinary approach to the complex challenges facing today's built and natural environments.

    Water, the world's most vital resource, is central to every aspect of city life: from basic human sustenance and public health to environmental remediation and overall urban renewal. Water is the driving theme of this year's Urban SOS competition.

    Finalists were invited to present their proposal in London on November 7, 2012. At this event it was Junghwa Suh, Chretien Macutay and Aarthi Padmanabhan of the University of Hawaii at Manoa that won second place for their JALA HUB proposal. The Urban SOS water competition is designed to engage and inspire students to address the preservation and management of water issues confronting the modern city and to encourage cross disciplinary solutions to these. Associate Professor Kazi Ashraf led the student team at the School of Architecture.

    Clark Llewellyn, FAIA, Dean of the School of Architecture, said, “This is a well deserved honor for our students. They continually generate innovative ideas to solve design problems that impact the way people live, work and study, whether it is climate change or water as a scarce resource.” The School has developed a reputation for its strong connections to the Asia Pacific region and its integration of theory and practice. It is the only architectural school in the United States that offers a NAAB accredited Doctor of Architecture degree.



    02.24.2012

    Universty of Hawai'i: New 4+3 Structure
    The School of Architecture at the University of Hawaii at Manoa has split the existing accredited single-degree D. Arch. program into a multi-degree sequence. Consistent with the national model of a 4+3 sequence, the School of Architecture has divided the existing NAAB-accredited 7-year D. Arch. degree into a 4-year pre-professional Bachelor of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies (Environmental Design) program and 3-year D. Arch. graduate program. The terminal degree will continue to be the NAAB-accredited D. Arch. Degree. Previous degree level will dictate the student's curriculum plan. Students with a pre-professional undergraduate degree typically will enroll into a 3 year graduate plan that consists of 90 graduate credits. Students with a non-pre-professional undergraduate degree will enroll into a 3 ½ year graduate plan that consists of 108 graduate credits.

    The School of Architecture at the University of Hawaii at Manoa offers the only NAAB accredited Doctor of Architecture (DArch) degree. The program provides students the unique opportunity to extensively research a particular area of interest, supported by interdisciplinary course work and a semesters of professional studio at over 30 practicum firms.

    The primary activities in the D.Arch program include:
    • Framing architectural inquires within social, cultural, and interdisciplinary studies with emphasis on Asia and the Pacific;
    • Investigating local/global relations evidenced in theory and practice with an emphasis on the quality of the built and natural environment;
    • Critically testing and expanding the definitions of, and relationships between the academy and the profession;
    • Using research as a basis for the grounding of design and as a primary means to expand knowledge in the discipline; and
    • Participating with local and international partners in applied design research and community outreach projects.

    The School of Architecture at the University of Hawaii at Manoa advises all interested applicants seeking a 4-year pre-professional Bachelor of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies (Environmental Design) and all graduate level students seeking a D. Arch. to express their interest in the program through application to The School of Architecture at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. Thank you for your interest and stay posted as more information is released about the our 4+3 sequence.

    01.30.2012

    TONGJI PROGRAM APPLICATION PROCESS
    Beginning fall 2012, SCHOOL of ARCHITECTURE at UNIVERSITY of HAWAI‘I, MĀNOA, and COLLEGE of ARCHITECTURE and URBAN PLANNING at TONGJI UNIVERSITY, SHANGHAI are partnering to offer a unique dual degree opportunity resulting in an accredited MASTER of ARCHITECTURE in CHINA and an accredited DOCTOR of ARCHITECTURE in the UNITED STATES. Please click here to review the application process if you are an interested candidate.


    11.25.2011

    ATTENTION: THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I-MĀNOA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE ANNOUNCES THE GLOBAL TRACK/CHINA FOCUS DUAL DEGREE OPPORTUNITY TO START IN FALL 2012!

    Graduate Dual-Degree Option: A Doctor of Architecture (D.Arch.) from University of Hawai‘i-Mānoa School of Architecture, and an optional Master of Architecture from Tongji University, Shanghai, China
    || In partnership with Tongji University College of Architecture and Urban Planning (Shanghai, China), the University of Hawai‘i-Mānoa School of Architecture has implemented a three-year Global Track/China Focus for students with a pre-professional or professional degree in Architecture. Students who successfully complete this track will have the option to obtain a National Board of Architectural Education (NBAE of China) Master of Architecture degree from Tongji University and will receive a National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB of U.S.A) accredited Doctor of Architecture degree from the University of Hawai‘i. No other institutional partnership in the world offers accredited professional architectural degrees in the world’s two largest construction economies, China and the United States. More information about the track and how to apply will be coming to the website soon.

    For further information, please contact:
    Professor Spencer Leineweber, Graduate Chair aspencer@hawaii.edu or
    Clark E. Llewellyn, Professor and Dean at clarklle@hawaii.edu

    01.25.2011

    NEW TENURE TRACK FACULTY POSITIONS AVAILABLE

    The School of Architecture seeks outstanding candidates to fill five open tenure-track faculty positions at the assistant and associate professor levels. Pending available funds.

    The new positions are in the following teaching and research areas of the School’s NAAB Accredited Professional Doctor of Architecture program: Basic Design, Structures and Building Technology, Indigenous Architecture with Pacific Focus, Landscape Architecture, and Environmental Design with a Public Health Focus.

    Minimum Qualifications for these positions are: a) an accredited professional degree in architecture, landscape architecture, engineering, and/or b) distinctive practice record with a professional license or expectation to be licensed; and/or c) PhD degree (or equivalent) in an area of specialization underpinned by a significant record of research and publication.

    Candidates with prior teaching experience, expertise in sustainability design, and design in the Asia/Pacific context are highly desired. In addition to teaching, successful candidates will be expected to actively pursue creative and scholarly work, demonstrate academic resourcefulness including the ability to obtain extramural funding, and participate in service activities at the school, university and community levels.

    The School of Architecture offers a collaborative approach to improving the built and natural environment founded on intellectual inquiry, creative problem solving, and outreach with a commitment to prominence in innovative architectural education, design excellence, sustainability, and research with a focus on Hawaii, the Pacific and Asia. Faculty members are expected to support these program goals in their teaching, research and service activities. Candidates are directed to the School's web page for additional information on its vision and mission.


    Specific Duties and Responsibilities of the Individual Positions

    Basic Design
    The faculty member will teach and coordinate the Basic Design curriculum within the School. The faculty member will be charged with the development of an effective and apt pedagogy for introductory design within the emerging interdisciplinary curriculum of the DArch program, a challenging context that can foster an expansive understanding of design linked to inclusive and critical studies yet able to also address basic design issues of conceptual acuity, perceptual attunement, ordering systems for form, space, tectonics and appropriate methods to communicate fundamental aspects of design. The faculty member will be expected to pursue research or creative activity to reinforce the teaching philosophy. Additional expectations are collaborative work with faculty to develop the curriculum, supervision of graduate students and participation in departmental, university, and professional activities.

    Preferred candidate will have a professional degree in Architecture from an accredited college, university or foreign equivalent with a license to practice (or in progress), and experience in one or more of the following areas of architecture: introductory design education, history and theory of world architecture, design communication and fabrication using analog and digital methods. The candidate should have demonstrated design ability evident in peer-reviewed publications or built work.

    Indigenous Architecture with Pacific Focus
    The faculty member will teach both design studio at various levels of the program and also required and elective courses. Expertise brought to the program will include knowledge of human behavior and societal roles relating to cultural diversity and indigenous values. The faculty should also be able to teach advanced architectural design studios that examine the interface of cultural and environmental issues. The faculty member will develop and conduct research in a teaching area of relevant interest and nurture collaborative relationships with local, national and international practitioners and scholars, supervise graduate students, and participate in departmental, university, and professional activities.

    Preferred candidate is expected to have a Ph.D. in Architecture, Pacific Island Studies, Cultural Studies, Geography, or a closely related field from an accredited college, university or foreign equivalent [ABD will be considered] or a post professional degree in Architecture. Experience in one or more of the following areas of architecture and planning is desirable: natural resource management, land use management, environmental design.

    Structures and Building Technology
    The faculty member will teach required and elective courses for structures and building systems with an emphasis on the Asia/Pacific region highlighting technological inventiveness and issues of comprehensive sustainability in Hawai‘i, the tropics and the Asia/Pacific region. The faculty member will foster critical systems thinking across the spectrum of the program and develop interdisciplinary activity with related departments in the university including ecology, economics, engineering, political science and geography. The faculty member is also expected to implement instruction that actively draws on expertise from the professional engineering community at both the local and international scale, to teach in design studios at various levels and conduct research related to complex systems thinking, supervise graduate students, and participate in departmental, university, and professional activities.

    Preferred candidate will have a professional degree in Architecture or Engineering from an accredited college, university or foreign equivalent with a license to practice (or in progress). Expected is a demonstrated ability to integrate technological issues within design studio teaching. Proficiency in one or more of the following areas is desirable: structural design, systems logic, architectural technology, environmental technology.

    Landscape Architecture
    The faculty member will teach design with an emphasis on landscape architecture in upper division and graduate level design studios within the School of Architecture. Duties also include teaching required and/or elective courses focusing on the integration of architecture, landscape and issues of sustainability in Hawai‘i, the tropics and the Asia/Pacific region. The successful candidate will expand the curriculum to reinforce the recently adopted strategic plan of the School which includes both a significant environmental focus and a multidisciplinary approach to the program. The faculty member will develop and conduct research and nurture collaborative relationships with local, national and international practitioners and scholars, supervise graduate students, and participate in departmental, university, and professional activities.

    Preferred candidate will have a professional degree in Architecture or Landscape Architecture from an accredited college, university or foreign equivalent with a license to practice (or in progress) and experience in one or more of the following areas: natural resource management, land use management, environmental design, history and theory of world landscape design. The candidate should have proven design ability evident in peer-reviewed publications or built work.

    Environmental Design with a Public Health Focus
    The faculty member will have teaching and research responsibilities in the School of Architecture (51%) and also the Office of Public Health Studies (49%). Tenure and Review process will be within the School of Architecture. Duties in the School of Architecture will include advising within design studios and teaching required lecture and elective courses. The faculty member will teach in Architecture with an emphasis on human behavior, collaboration, accessibility, sustainability, site design, community and social responsibility. Other duties include teaching required and/or elective courses in the Office of Public Health Studies. (Scope to be determined by the Office of Public Health Studies.) Additional expectations are supervision of graduate students and participation in departmental, university, and professional activities.

    Preferred candidate is expected to have a Ph.D. in Architecture, Public Health, Psychology or a closely related field from an accredited college, university or foreign equivalent [ABD will be considered] or a post professional degree in Architecture. The candidate should also demonstrate the ability to work collaboratively across relevant university departments and public sector entities.


    How to Apply:

    Application can be transmitted electronically or mailed as a printed document.
    Application materials must include:

    1. cover letter identifying specific position of interest for the applicant
    2. curriculum vitae
    3. statement of teaching philosophy
    4. samples of research or creative projects (maximum 20 single sided pages)
    5. names and contact information for three (3) references

    Faculty Search Committee / UHM School of Architecture
    2410 Campus Road, Honolulu, Hawaii, U.S.A. 96822
    or

    ArSearch@hawaii.edu

    Questions regarding the search should be directed to the Faculty Search Committee. The search will be open until the positions are filled.

    01.20.2011

    UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MANOA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE STUDENT TEAM ANNOUNCED AS NATIONAL FINALIST FOR THE 2010 USGBC NATURAL TALENT DESIGN COMPETITION || Student Finalists' designs to be built into affordable LEED Platinum homes in New Orleans' Broadmoor neighborhood.

    The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) has announced the student team "Greenboy Productions" from the University of Hawai‘i at Manoa School of Architecture as one of two student finalists to see their sustainable home designs come to life in New Orleans. The winning design team includes architecture students Frank Alsup, Sanphawat Jatupatwarangkul, Tuan Tran & Ramo Khem. Members of the team will travel to New Orleans to meet with local architects and community leaders of the Broadmoor District, as well as showcase their design at the 2010 USGBC Greenbuild International Conference and Expo in Chicago. This marks the first year that a Hawai`i student team has participated in the national competition.

    The USGBC Hawai`i Chapter, in collaboration with Stephen Meder at the University of Hawai‘i School of Architecture, hosted the local portion of the design competition during the Spring Semester of 2010. Meder, along with five local jurors with a diverse knowledge of sustainable design and construction carefully chose Greenboy Productions as the Hawai‘i representative to compete with over 360 design submissions.

    Greenboy's design was selected nationally based on their innovative, affordable, ADA-compliant (American Disabilities Act), LEED (Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design) Platinum home, that demonstrated green building principles and will save the future homeowners money over the life-cycle of the home. The winning design maintained respect for the Broadmoor aesthetic and the opinion of the neighborhood as captured by the community vote, held earlier in the summer. To view their winning design, please visit: A Greenboy Production.
    "The USGBC Hawai‘i Chapter congratulates and is honored to have the design team of Greenboy Productions chosen as a National Finalist. The group has such a great balance of passion, creativity, and the technical skills needed to design such a high performing home. It is great testament to the UH School of Architecture and the dedication of our student talent towards progressive design" said Jason Selley, USGBC Hawai`i Emerging Professionals & Students Chair.

    Very special thanks goes to each of the 2010 Hawai`i student teams for their participation, to the jury and mentoring professionals who dedicated their time and expertise to support our local student teams!

    Hawai‘i Competition Jury:
    Gail Suzuki-Jones, Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism
    Daniel Sandomire, Armstrong Development Ltd.
    Laurie Takahashi, Takahashi Architecture
    Ross Yamasaki, KYA Sustainability Studio
    Guy Akasaki, Commercial Roofing & Waterproofing Hawai`i, Inc.
    Stephen Meder, University of Hawai‘i School of Architecture
    & Director of the Center for Smart Building and Community Design

    Architecture Mentorship Sponsors:
    Wayne Goo, WCIT Architecture
    Ross Yamasaki, KYA Sustainability Studio
    Branka Knezevic,Group 70 International, Inc.

    Construction Mentorship Sponsors:
    Angela Hines, Swinerton Builders Hawai‘i
    Alan Levy, Nordic PCL Construction, Inc.
    Jason Wanstrath, Pankow Special Projects, L.P.

    National Competition Jury:
    Rick Fedrizzi, President and CEO, U.S. Green Building Council
    Cameron Sinclair, Co-founder, Architecture of Humanity
    LaToya Cantrell, President, Broadmoor Improvement Association
    Bob Berkebile, Principal, BNIM
    Valerie Casey, Founder & CEO, Designers Accord
    Rose Jackson Flenorl, Manager of Social Responsibility, FedEx
    Captain Ethan Frizzell, Area Commander, Salvation Army New Orleans
    Kurt Hagstette, Associate Director, Eskew+Dumez+Ripple Architects
    Lindsay Jonker, Executive Director, Salvation Army's EnviRenew
    Liz Ogbu, Associate Design Director, Public Architecture

    For more details about the 2010 Natural Talent Design Competition and to see all the local and national competition entries, please visit: www.usgbchawaii.org and www.usgbc.org/designcompetition.

    Contact: Jason Selley
    USGBC Hawai‘i Chapter
    jason.selley@usgbchawaii.org

    10.01.2010

    TO COMPETE IN THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S 2011 SOLAR DECATHLON || University of Hawai‘i at Manoa - The U.S. Department of Energy announced that The University of Hawai‘i at Manoa with partner Honolulu Community College (teamhawai‘i) is amongst the 20 teams selected to compete in the 2011 Solar Decathlon, a design-build competition that takes place on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. The competition challenges teams of college and university students from across the United States and the world to create and operate solar-powered houses that are affordable, energy-efficient, and attractive.

    The teamhawai‘i entry will include advancements in composite material, building-integrated concentrated photovoltaics, building-integrated radiant heating and cooling systems, and novel affordable home design for tropical climates like Hawai‘i. The team is led by faculty from the School of Architecture including Associate Professor David Rockwood and Assistant Professor Hyoung-June Park, faculty and staff from the College of Engineering including Assistant Professor David Garmire (Electrical Engineering), Associate Professor Weilin Qu (Mechanical Engineering) and Justin Akagi (Dean's Office), colleagues from Honolulu Community College including Dean Mark Silliman and Noel "Red" Griffiths-Seewerker, and industry professionals such as William Paluch (Eight Inc. and SoA Lecturer).

    The first Solar Decathlon was held in 2002; the competition has since occurred biennially in 2005, 2007, and 2009, with the next event will taking place in fall 2011. Free and open to the public, visitors can tour the houses on the National Mall and learn how energy-saving features can help them save money and reduce their carbon footprint today. In 2009, the U.S. Department of Energy's Solar Decathlon provided 307,502 house visits to the public over 10 days.

    Applications for the 2011 competition went through a rigorous evaluation process by panels of engineers, scientists, experts from the Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and professionals from the American Institute of Architects, National Association of Home Builders, the U.S. Green Building Council, building industry media, and the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers. Teams had to demonstrate the viability, efficiency, and innovation of their designs, as well as the ability to raise funds and assemble a team that would successfully complete the project.

    teamhawai‘i now has 18 months to recruit the best and brightest students, manage the project across multiple departments, perform cutting-edge research, and construct a solar-powered house to compete in Washington, D.C. in Fall 2011. The University of Hawai`i will receive $100,000 from the Department of Energy to help defray expenses of building and transporting the house. The university is seeking donations of professional expertise, materials, and funds. Those interested in donating or otherwise being involved in the project, please contact:

    David Rockwood, Associate Professor
    archawai‘i | School of Architecture
    2410 Campus Road; Honolulu, HI 96822
    E | rockwood@hawaii.edu
    P | 808.956.8430

    For more information about the U.S. Department of Energy's Solar Decathlon,
    visit http://www.solardecathlon.gov.

    04.19.2010

    A CHINATOWN MULTI-MEDIA EXHIBITION || Chinatown Presents Futures, a multi-media installation at Honolulu Culture & Arts District / Small Business Resource Center, 1041 Nu'uanu Ave., Suite A, opens on First Friday, May 7th, from 4:00 to 9:00 pm. The exhibit will remain open for public viewing from May 10 to 14, 3:00 - 7:00 pm (Not open Saturday and Sunday).

    As part of a semester-long urban design studio, the graduate students at archawai‘i researched "Chinatown" and used it as a laboratory for understanding ways of interpreting the city, and making thoughtful propositions for selected areas. The investigation culminates in Chinatown Presents Futures, a multi-level exhibition that examines Chinatown as a unique urban phenomenon and offers ways of generating new futures.

    Participants from archawai‘i include: Camryn Bonifacio, Keng Chua, Kloe Kang, Mary Kodama, Noryn Lau, Biwen Li, Austin Poe, Jason Takeuchi, Allysa Taylor, Yukihiro Yamaguchi and instructors Kazi Ashraf and Cathi Ho.
    New WaterfrontNew Forest Bethel & Hotel Streets Accompanying Exhibition: "Honolulu 2050"
    Another architectural design project from archawai‘i -- Honolulu 2050 -- will accompany this exhibition. Honolulu 2050 investigates dense urban living in Honolulu in the context of a 2050 future scenario. The design project proposes altered urban patterns assuming increased world population and a tripling of current Honolulu population, sea level rise and climate change, forces of globalism and increased transience, practice of ecological responsibility, implementation of alternate transportation modes, redefinition of public and private domains, among other things.

    Participants from archawai‘i include Alana Aviel, David Cook, Ramo Khem, Corry Mabry, John Manuia, Heather Munoz. Logan Saldivar, Sofija Stanic, Tuan Tran, Takao Ugai, Lori Walker, and instructor, David Rockwood.
    Scenario for Honolulu 2050

    04.2010

    THE SCHOOL GATHERED OVER 700 POUNDS OF FOOD FOR THE HAWAII FOOD BANK THIS YEAR || Thank you to AIAS and all students who participated in the Edible Construction event on Saturday, April 10th, and to Staff and Faculty members who donated. Also, thank you to Diamond Bakery for generously donating 450 boxes of crackers to make the event possible.

    04.10.2010

    THE SCHOOL WOULD LIKE TO COMMEND ALL OF THE STUDENTS WHO SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS FOR SCHOLARSHIPS THIS YEAR || There were 113 applications in total and the high quality of the submissions made it very difficult to select only a dozen winners. Congratulations to: Nanako Imai, Kody Kato, Laurel Swan, Paolo Soriano, Queenie Leung, Takara Tada, Amber Abinsay, Biwen Li, Shao Yu Lin, Yuhei Miyake, Austin Poe, and Min Joo Kim.
    AIA Honolulu Chapter Scholarship

    Dean Clark Llewllyn, Amber Abinsay, Nanako Imai, Louis Fung, AIA
    Construction Specifications Institute Scholarship

    Rodney Lee, Honolulu Chapter CSI President, Laurel Swan, Dean Clark Llewellyn
    Donald G. Deer Memorial Scholarship

    Dean Clark Llewellyn, John Paolo Soriano, Jeff Deer, President, Bonded Materials
    Honolulu Blueprint & Supplies Scholarship

    Larry Heim, Owner, HonBlue, Inc. Nanako Imai, Dean Clark Llewellyn
    Johnson & Kelley Travel Fund

    Dean Clark Llewellyn, Queenie Leung, Takara Tada, Amber Abinsay, Jeanie Rolles, VP Community Relations, Outrigger Enterprises, Inc.
    R. Richard Morris Memorial Scholarship

    Dean Clark Llewellyn, Shao Yu Lin, Dwight Mitsunaga, Principal, Pacific Architects, Biwen Li

    UH SoA Alumni Association Scholarship

    Dean Clark Llewellyn, Min Joo Kim, Kenneth Chang, President, UH School of Architecture Alumni Assoc., Warren Loh, VP, UH SoA Alumni Assoc.

    04.10.2010
  • 16.events
    16.events

    events

    APR 27, 2012               ||   McInturff Architectures: In Detail

    APR 18-20, 2012         ||   Center for South Asian Studies 29th Annual Spring Symposium

    APR 04, 2012               ||   Open Architecture Network By Cameron Sinclair

    FEB 10, 2012               ||   mini Expo - Exterior Shading Systems

    JAN 25, 2012               ||   Talk Story PowerPoint and Talk Story & AIAS Minutes

    JAN 23, 2012               ||   IDEA HOUSE: Future Tropical Living Today

    DEC 05, 2011               ||   House For A Musher

    NOV 11, 2011               ||   Sustainability, Real Estate, and The 1K House

    OCT 12, 2011               ||   Talk Story with the Dean

    OCT 11, 2011               ||   Coelostats Pyranometers CNC and Simulation Architecture in the 21st Century

    SEPT 21, 2011             ||   Autotropholis : Toward Self-Sustaining Architecture and Urbanism

    SEPT 14, 2011             ||   Building Green In The Golden State Under a Brown Administration

    AUGUST 26, 2011       ||   A Design Framework For Turbulent Times

    APRIL 29, 2011           ||   Searching For True

    APRIL 06, 2011           ||   Shelter and Sacred Space

    MARCH 16, 2011         ||   Bolivia / Peru : photography

    MARCH 14, 2011         ||   high-performance architecture on an international scale

    MARCH 11 - 13, 2011   ||   A Weekend of Sustainability

    MARCH 09, 2011         ||   Balinese Vernacular Traditions

    FEBRUARY 19, 2011   ||   AIAS Sand Castle Esquisse at Kailua Beach Park

    FEBRUARY 16, 2011   ||   The Evolution of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial on the National Mall

    FEBRUARY 16, 2011   ||   All-school Charrette

  • 17.forms
    17.forms

    forms

    ADMISSIONS
    Undergraduate Systems Application || http://manoa.hawaii.edu/admissions/undergrad/
    Tuition & Fees || http://manoa.hawaii.edu/records/tuition_fees/
    Supplemental Information Form || pdf
    Transfer Credit Search || http://www.hawaii.edu/odstc/

    REGISTRATION
    Add Form || pdf
    Drop Form || pdf
    Program Chart || pdf

    SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE
    Request for Grad Check || pdf

    TONGJI PROGRAM APPLICATION PROCESS
    Application Process || pdf

    D.ARCH FORMS
    Doctorate Project Guidelines || pdf
    Signature & Title Pages || pdf
    Doctorate Academic Calendar || pdf
    Form I: Proposal Judgment || pdf
    Form II: Research Defense [ARCH 546] || pdf
    Form III: Pass/Fail Defense [ARCH 548] || pdf
    Form IV: Final Defense [ARCH 548] || pdf
    Form V: Document Submittal [ARCH 548] || pdf

  • 18.contact

    contact

    University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa
    School of Architecture
    2410 Campus Road
    Honolulu, Hawai'i 96822

    t  | 808.956.7225
    f  | 808.956.7778
    e | arch@hawaii.edu